Laserfiche WebLink
(7) The maximum gross floor area for the sum of all buildings in a project shall not exceed 45 <br /> percent of the total land area in the planned unit development. For purposes of determining <br /> compliance with this provision, the first two aboveground floors of structures used exclusively <br /> for parking of vehicles shall not be included as part of the gross floor area of the development. <br /> Subject to approval of the City Council, the gross floor area may be increased for any new <br /> Planned Unit Development that is located in the area known as the Northwest Quadrant project <br /> area, as defined by the Northwest Quadrant Framework Plan approved by the City Council. <br /> It is not possible to calculate total gross floor area without knowing how many of each housing <br /> style is proposed. However, a comparison can be made with existing single family <br /> neighborhoods in New Brighton, where "structural coverage" is the standard. Structural <br /> coverage is a review of footprint-to-lot area vs. gross (the sum of all floors)floor-to-lot area. <br /> Pulte is proposing a structural coverage percentage of 48% per lot where New Brighton's <br /> existing R-1A zoning district allows 40%. There is no doubt Pulte's proposal is more dense than <br /> existing single family neighborhoods in New Brighton. But, this is the vision for the area and <br /> density is a major determining factor for what creates a City Center. <br /> One point needing clarification is whether accessory structures should be allowed (like a shed). <br /> Staff would propose allowing accessory structures consistent with the Zoning Code standards <br /> already in place under Section 4-530, with the exception that structural coverage be increased to <br /> 48% and hardcover to 55% (as proposed by the applicant). It is expected that Pulte's HOA <br /> would regulate architectural design. <br /> Overall this proposal results in a much less dense development than was previously envisioned <br /> (8) All buildings shall observe the following setbacks unless otherwise specified by the Council <br /> at the time of approval of the planned unit development: <br /> A. There shall be a minimum setback of the height of the building, or thirty feet, whichever <br /> is greater, from all property lines that form the perimeter of the entire plan of the planned <br /> unit development. Subject to approval of the City Council, building setbacks may be <br /> decreased from the perimeter setback requirement for any new Planned Unit <br /> Development if pedestrian linkages to neighboring developments for residents, <br /> employees, or shoppers are provided along with an approved streetscape plan with <br /> enhanced landscaping. <br /> Generally, a 30'perimeter setback will be met from most boundaries. There are a few <br /> areas where the side street or front of a home abuts a perimeter boundary, where a 25' <br /> setback is proposed. The most obvious exception to this requirement will be the 10' <br /> setback along Old Highway 8 NW for the townhomes. However, this is a very important <br /> design element. Staff finds this standard to be met because the development includes an <br /> extensive sidewalk system, with pedestrian nodes and linkages to the rest of the <br /> development and Long Lake Regional Park, and includes extensively landscaped outlots, <br /> medians, and open spaces. <br /> To address the landscaping concerns more specifically, the applicant has provided a <br /> boulevard tree approximately every 80'. The applicant's narrative also discusses <br /> planting a minimum of two trees per lot and perimeter foundation landscaping, rock and <br /> edging. The applicant has also proposed heavily landscaped and irrigated open space <br /> areas, especially for screening along the adjacent rail line to the west. <br />