Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> Not Approved <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS <br /> Regular Meeting—June 18, 2013 7:00 p.m. <br /> Present: Chairperson Bruce Howard,Commissioners Paul Banker, Steve Danger,Erin Nichols-Matkaiti, Greg Meyers, <br /> and Verne McPherson <br /> Absent:Commissioner Mike Shardlow <br /> Also Present: Janice Gundlach-City Planner, and Mary Burg-Councilmember <br /> Agenda Review: There were no changes to the agenda. <br /> Minutes from May 21, 2013: <br /> Motion by Commissioner Banker,seconded by Commissioner Meyers,to approve the May 21, 2013 meeting <br /> minutes as presented. <br /> Approved 6-0. <br /> Council Action: Councilmember Burg reported the APi and Pulte developments in the New Brighton Exchange were <br /> approved by the Council at their June 11th meeting. She noted an Urban Farming Task Force was being formed. Those <br /> interested in serving on this task force should contact City staff. She explained the Council was now beginning the 2014 <br /> budget process and setting priorities for the coming year. <br /> Public Hearing: <br /> (A) Todd Martenson requests a Special Use Permit in order to construct a detached garage in excess of 624 <br /> SF and a Nonconforming Use Permit recognizing existing principal structure setback nonconformities at <br /> 703 4t1 Avenue NW. <br /> City Planner Janice Gundlach reported the applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow construction of a <br /> detached garage in excess of 624 square feet. In addition, a Nonconforming Use Permit is required because the home's <br /> existing front yard setback and side street setback are less than required by code. She noted the property was zoned R-1A. <br /> The existing front yard setback is 21' and the existing side street setback is 8' when 30' is normally required. The <br /> existing detached garage also does not meet the required 30' side street setback either,but was likely constructed prior to <br /> 1982 when the side street setback requirement was only 15',thus making it conforming. The original home was <br /> constructed in 1890. The applicant will be removing an existing shed in conjunction with construction of the proposed <br /> 952 square foot garage. The proposed garage would have access off the existing alleyway from the east. <br /> Planner Gundlach explained the applicant initially applied for a building permit to construct a large addition to the <br /> existing detached garage. After advising the applicant of the accessory structure regulations of Section 4-530,the <br /> applicant revised his request and made application for a Special Use Permit. Sometime in mid-May,the applicant paved a <br /> small section of concrete driveway in the front yard. It is suspected this was for access to the previously planned garage <br /> and it is unclear if the applicant proposes to keep this driveway,being the revised plans show driveway access off the <br /> alleyway. Staff recommends approval of the Special Use Permit and Nonconforming Use Permit, subject to the following <br /> conditions: <br /> • The proposed garage is constructed in accordance with the plans submitted with the Special Use Permit and <br /> Nonconforming Use Permit applications. <br /> • The applicant shall not use the garage for a home occupation activity. <br /> 1 <br />