My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
EDC 05-21-2013
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
EDC
>
EDC Packets
>
2013
>
EDC 05-21-2013
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2021 11:32:22 AM
Creation date
9/18/2013 9:53:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EDC Meeting Agenda <br /> May 21, 2013 <br /> Page 3 <br /> Due Diligence: Pulte will have 120 days from execution of the redevelopment <br /> agreement to conduct due diligence. This would include all City <br /> land use approvals (i.e. PUD,plat, zoning amendments, etc.) and <br /> MPCA approval. While ambitious,this keeps the pressure on Pulte <br /> to stay on schedule. <br /> Master Pulte will create a master association to handle the maintenance of <br /> Association: common areas within their private development. In addition, <br /> they have agreed to take on some of the responsibilities for the <br /> main entrance and north entrance; and the boulevards along Old <br /> Highway 8. This will help reduce the City's future maintenance <br /> responsibilities. <br /> Fees: The developer will pay all of the customary fees (i.e. building <br /> permits, SAC/WAC and park dedication)that are required of a <br /> typical development. <br /> Environmental: This is one of the areas that Pulte needs to explore further. The <br /> company needs to work with the MPCA to gain approval of its <br /> development plans. It is unclear how long this might take. The <br /> Redevelopment Agreement grants Pulte site access to conduct <br /> invasive testing and apply for environmental liability assurances <br /> from the agency. If these assurances can't be provided, it would be <br /> a basis for Pulte to withdraw their offer and earnest money <br /> ($50,000). <br /> Other Issues: One issue of disagreement concerned a legal mechanism known <br /> as a right-of-reverter, which gives the City the option(but not the <br /> obligation)to retake title if Pulte fails to perform. Pulte argued that <br /> they are paying cash for the site and investing substantial amounts <br /> in public improvements and are highly incentivized to make the <br /> development work. Alternative language is being drafted that will <br /> give the City the option to buy back the finished site at a pre- <br /> determined price if Pulte can't sell or develop the remaining lots or <br /> townhomes. <br /> The economics of Pulte's proposal are shown on Attachment 2. This analysis was prepared <br /> last December and shows the impact of Pulte's project, relative to some of the other <br /> redevelopment scenarios that the City envisioned. As we have discussed before, because <br /> Pulte's homes are priced in the $385,000 range,the market value of the project and tax capacity <br /> is comparable to higher density projects with lower unit values. economic impact. However, <br /> the City has no other development prospects for this site and there are some advantages to <br /> "kick-starting" commercial development with APi's proposal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.