My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 06-24-2014
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2014
>
CCP 06-24-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2014 12:21:59 PM
Creation date
6/20/2014 2:21:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
153
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
June 2, 2014 Page 2 of 4 <br />Council Business <br />1. Consideration of a Redevelopment Agreement for CSI *. Report No. 14 -136. <br />City Manager Lotter explained Community Development Director Femelius would be presenting this item to <br />Council. <br />Community Development Director Femelius reported in January of this year the City was approached by <br />Ryan Companies and Colliers International about anew corporate headquarters project for New Brighton - <br />based Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. After initial discussions, staff learned that CSI had narrowed its national <br />search to a handful of sites in Minnesota, including New Brighton Exchange (NBE). This search process is <br />relevant because many ofthe initial deal points, especially what CSI was willing pay for land, was a function <br />of competing offers made by other communities. In February, the Council provided critical input on the <br />negotiations with regard to site location, land pricing and support for assisting with certain environmental <br />remediation and public improvement costs. On this last point, the City is continuing with a strategy to write <br />down land prices to assist with certain extraordinary costs — a model that has been used on previous deals <br />including Transoma and Pulte Homes. By early March, CSI made the decision to select NBE as their new <br />corporate home and since that time the parties have been working out the details of the project through a <br />Contract for Private Redevelopment. The negotiation process has been challenging, due to a very fast track <br />construction schedule and the fact that three parties (the City, Ryan and CSI) have been involved in the <br />contract review. It should be noted that the original framework ofthe deal was crafted as a build-to-suit-to- <br />lease project with Ryan acting as the developer/landlord and CSI acting as the tenant. In early April, CSI <br />made a business decision to own the building — meaning it would acquire the land directly from the City and <br />use Ryan as the general contractor. In the end, this project is better described as a sort ofhybrid deal in which <br />Ryan is functioning as a general contractor, but is participating financially like a landlord and committing <br />resources in order to make the project work. The negotiations have been very intense and the parties seemed <br />to have reached agreement on the major elements. Staff provided the Council with a summary ofthe key <br />provisions and related commentary on the changes from the last Council meeting. The business terms were <br />discussed at length. He noted the major deal points in the document have been agreed to by all parties. He <br />noted any substantive changes (legal, economic, or material) would be brought back to the City Council for <br />consideration. The financial and tax impacts ofthe project were reviewed in detail with the Council and staff <br />recommended the Council approve adoption of a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to <br />execute the Redevelopment Agreement with Ryan Companies and CSI for an office redevelopment project <br />in NBE. <br />Councilmember Bauman thanked staff for the thorough presentation. She asked ifthe City has seen the <br />agreement between Ryan and CSI. Community Development Director Femelius commented the City has <br />not reviewed this agreement. <br />Councilmember Bauman questioned how the City would be impacted if the terms of the agreement between <br />Ryan and CSI were not followed through. City Attorney Landsman explained the development agreement <br />with the City does require specific improvements to be completed by a date certain. He reported the <br />agreement between Ryan and CSI would address how the work was completed. If Ryan did not meet these <br />obligations, a default or breach of contract would be triggered within the City's development agreement. He <br />discussed the investment interest that CSI had in this project to and commented this would ensure the project <br />was completed in a timely manner according to the agreements in place. <br />Councilmember Bauman requested further information on how Phase U would be developed. Casey <br />Haakenson, Ryan Companies, stated Ryan would be interested in constructing Phase 11 ofthe CSI project; <br />however, the timing ofthis project was uncertain. He explained that when CSI was ready for this expansion <br />(Phase 11) this project would have to come back before the Council for PUD approval. <br />Councilmember Burg commented the Council addressed the concerns ofthe Redevelopment Agreement in a <br />worksession meeting. She appreciated the efforts of staff and all parties involved. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen thanked each ofthe partners for coming together and for working with City staffto <br />make this redevelopment a reality. <br />Councilmember Bauman was pleased with the TTF implications that were agreed upon within this <br />Council Business <br />1, Consideration of a <br />Redevelopment <br />Agreement for CSI *. <br />Report No. 14 -136. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.