My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-02-2014
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 2014
>
06-02-2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2015 11:38:37 AM
Creation date
7/24/2014 3:04:22 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Council Business <br />l. Consideration of a Redevelopment Agreement for CSI*. Report No. 14-136. <br />Cþ Manager I¡tter explained Community Development Director Femelius would be presenting this item to <br />Council. <br />Communif Development Director Femelius reported in January ofthis year the City was approached by <br />Ryan Companies and Colliers Intemational about a new corporate headquarten project for New Brighton- <br />based Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. After initial discussions, staffleamed that CSI had nanowed its national <br />search trc a handful of sites in Minnesota including New Brighton Exchange 0'IBE)' This search proces is <br />relevant because many of the initial deal points, eqpecially what CSI was willing pay for land, was a fi¡nction <br />of competing offers made by other communities. In February, the Council provided øitical input on the <br />negotiæions with regæd to site locatior¡ land pricing and support for assisting with certain environmental <br />remediation and public improvement costs. On this last poinl the City is continuing with a sbatery to write <br />down land prices to assist with certain extaordinary costs - a model that has been used on previous deals <br />including Trarsoma and Pulte Homes. By early Marcll CSI made the decision to selectNBE as their new <br />corporate home and since that time the parties have been working out the details ofthe project thÍ:ugh a <br />Contact for hivate Redevelopment. The negotiation process has been challengng, due to a very fast tack <br />construction schedule and the fact that three parties (the Clty, Ryan and CS| have been involved in the <br />contact review It should be noted that the original fiamework ofthe deal was crafted as a build-to'suit-to- <br />lease project with Ryan acting as the developer/landlord and CSI acting as the tenant In early April, CSI <br />made abusiness decisionto ownthebuilding-meaningitwould acquiretheland dirrectlyfromtheCityand <br />use Ryan as the general conûactor. hr the en{ this project is better described as a sort ofhybrid deal in which <br />Ryan is f,nctioning as a general conûactor, but is participating financially like a landlord and mmmitting <br />resources in order to make the project work The negotiations have been very intense and the parties seemed <br />to have reached agreement on the major elements. Staffprovided the Council with a summary of the key <br />provisions and related commentary on the changes fi,om the last Courcil meeting. The business terms werc <br />discussed at lengtlr- He noted the major deal points in the document have been agreed to by all parties. He <br />noted any substantive changes (legal, economic, or material) would be brought back to the City Council for <br />consideration. The financial and tax impacts of tlre project were reviewed in detail with the Cowrcil and staff <br />recommended the Council approve adoption of a Resolution authorizing the Mayor and Cþ Manager to <br />execute the RedevelopmurtAgreement with Ryan Companies and CSI for an office redevelopmentproject <br />inNBE. <br />Councilmember Bauman thanked stafffor the thorougþ presentation, She asked ifthe Clty has seen the <br />agreement between Ryan and CSI. Community Development Director Femelius commented the Ctty ha. <br />not reviewed this agreement. <br />Councilmember Bauman questioned howthe City would be impacted ifthe terms ofthe agreement betu¡een <br />Ryan and CSI were not followed through. City Attrrmey t^andsman oçlained the development agreement <br />with the City does require qpecific improvements to be completed by a date certain. He reported the <br />agreement between Ryan and CSI would address how the wotk was completed. If Ryan did not meet these <br />obligations, a default or brrach of contact would be tiggered within the City's development agreemurt He <br />discussed tlre investnent interest that CSI had in this project to and commented this would ensure the project <br />was completed in a timely manner according to the ageements in place, <br />Councilmember Bauman roquested further information on how Phase II would be developed. Casey <br />Haakenson, Ryan Companies, stated Ryan would be interested in consfucting Phase II ofthe CSI projecq <br />however, the timing ofthis project was uncertain He e>çlained that when CSI was ready for this expansion <br />(Phase Q ttris project would have to come back before the Council for PIID approval. <br />Councilmember Bwg commented the Council addressed the concems ofthe Redevelopment Agreement in a <br />worksession meeting. She appreciated the efforts of staffand all parties involved. <br />Councilmember Jacobsenthanked eachofthe partrers for coming together and forworking with Cþ statrto <br />make this redevelopment arulitY. <br />Councilmember Bauman was pleased with the TIF implications tlnt were agreed upon within this <br />June2,20l4 Page2of4 <br />Council Business <br />l. Consideration ofa <br />Redevelopment <br />Agreement for CSI*. <br />ReportNo. l4-136.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.