Laserfiche WebLink
Given these changes, staff would recommend approval of the Zoning Code Amendment as <br /> drafted by staff and the City Attorney. <br /> SITE PLAN ANALYSIS <br /> Because the typical site plan analysis of setbacks, parking and building height do not really <br /> apply, staff has provided the below analysis based on the five main components of the site plan: <br /> 1) Pile Storage Area, 2) Equipment Storage Area, 3) Screening/Noise, 4) Rail Siding and 5) <br /> Interoffice Comments. That analysis is provided below: <br /> Pile Storage Area <br /> The applicant has illustrated on the proposed site plan the area they plan to use for pile storage. <br /> Staff has prepared a site plan detail illustrating the pile storage area as 22 acres. The large rubble <br /> and processed pile locations are not changing and the sound barrier (berm and wall) are not <br /> impacted. The additional storage area will be used for "a more varied product line utilizing a <br /> wider spectrum of material types" including "topsoil, borrow, select and rain garden mix <br /> specifications". The applicant also makes mention of storage of road salt. It should be clarified <br /> that road salt is only for the applicant's internal use and under no circumstances is the applicant <br /> permitted to store road salt on the property in a quantity beyond the applicant's needs or for a 3rd <br /> party. Staff finds the pile storage area of the site plan to be acceptable. <br /> Equipment Storage Area <br /> The applicant proposes to increase the area used for equipment storage. Based on the current <br /> equipment storage area, this increase is approximately two acres (or a doubling in size). In total, <br /> the equipment storage area is proposed at just over four acres. Being the equipment stored in this <br /> area is primarily accessory to the applicant's business; staff finds it reasonable to allow this as <br /> part of the overall site plan expansion. This area must be screened from the public right-of-way <br /> of Old Highway 8 NW. <br /> Screening/Noise <br /> The original berm along the western property boundary will remain intact. Additionally, the <br /> newly acquired property on the south side of the railroad tracts is being used for infiltration <br /> basins and will provide screening to the south. The main screening concern is screening the <br /> equipment storage area from Old Highway 8 NW. The applicant has proposed constructing an 8' <br /> berm. A chain link fence will secure the area. Based on the 650' distance to Old Highway 8 <br /> NW, an 8' berm seems reasonable. However, this 8' berm shall be constructed with a material <br /> that allows for a vegetated cover(no rubble). <br /> The applicant maintains that noise impacts will not change. This is likely the case in that the <br /> majority of the noise is attributed to the dumping of rubble, which is regulated by the sound <br /> barrier. The applicant's narrative indicates the sound barrier will remain intact and no increases <br /> in audible noise to the residential neighborhoods to the west should be felt. <br /> Rail Siding <br /> The applicant's site plan has arbitrarily shown a 1000' rail siding along the north side of the <br /> existing tracks. This area is labeled "Approximate Location of Future Rail Road Siding". The <br /> applicant also makes mention of the future addition of a rail siding within the narratives. Rail car <br /> storage is unsightly, is an attractive target for graffiti, and can create a lot of noise with the <br /> connecting and disconnecting of cars. Additionally, with an area as large as proposed for rail <br /> cars (could accommodate at least 10), staff is concerned the applicant and/or the railroad will use <br />