Laserfiche WebLink
April22, 2014 Page 4 of 12 <br />$18,000 for five years. The annual average cost per home would be approximately $210. Staff <br />recommended the Council hold a public improvement hearing then adopt an Ordinance <br />establishing a Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District and adopt a Resolution ordering Project <br />13-20. <br />Councilmember Bauman questioned who determined which homes were included in the pond <br />improvement district. Senior Engineering Supervisor Schlichting indicated the homes included <br />in the 2013 petition were the same properties that were included in the 2005 petition. Public <br />Works Director Wyffels commented a neighbor within Innsbruck went door to door to gain the <br />signatures of the homeowners. <br />Councilmember Bauman believed that the adjacent townhomes should be a part of this <br />improvement district as they would also benefit from the pond improvements . <br />Motion by Councilmember Burg, seconded by Councilmember Jacobsen to open the <br />Public Hearing. <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays -Motion Carried <br />The Public Hearing was opened at 6:57 p.m. <br />Mayor Jacobsen asked for additional comments. <br />Henrik Swika, 3020 Linden Drive, explained he has lived in his home since 1994 and was one <br />of the first homes on the street. He presented the Council with a video on how Innsbruck Pond <br />has changed over the past 20 years. <br />Mary Beth Midiko, 3181 Linden Drive, commented she could not even see the pond from her <br />home, due to the overgrowth surrounding the pond. She noted she originally signed the <br />petition, but requested her name be removed from the petition as her property would not <br />benefit from the pond improvements. She had no idea that when she signed the petition she <br />was signing up to assume an expense to improve the pond . She recommended that homes <br />closer to the pond be pursued to assist in the expense of the pond taxation district. <br />Naanan Durell, 2940 Linden Drive, indicated he started the petition process. He reviewed the <br />information he provided to the homeowners around the pond noting it specifically states the 16 <br />homeowners would be responsible for 75% of the pond improvements through the creation of a <br />taxing district. He reported he was not trying to keep the financial aspect of the improvements <br />hidden from the homeowners. <br />Councilmember Bauman asked if Mr. Durell had approached the townhomes, or single family <br />homes to the east, in order to include the properties in the improvement district. Mr. Durell <br />reviewed the homes he approached for the district. He apologized for not contacting the <br />adjacent single family homes. <br />Councilmember Burg agreed that additional properties should be included in the proposed <br />taxation district as there were other properties that would directly benefit from the pond <br />improvements. She explained that she lived within the Bicentennial Pond taxing district and <br />noted it worked extremely well. She questioned if staff determined which properties should or <br />should not be included. Senior Engineering Supervisor Schlichting reported staff was not a <br />part ofthe petitioning process. Staffhas simply informed Mr. Durell that he needed to collect <br />a petition of interest with signatures from 75% of his neighbors. He noted that the 16 homes <br />approached in 2013 were the same homes that were a part of the 2005 district. He stated that <br />public hearing announcements were not sent to any properties outside of the 16 homes on the <br />petition. <br />Councilmember Burg indicated that dredging the pond may negate some of the current pond