Laserfiche WebLink
April 28, 2015 <br />Director Gundlach stated that the Rice Creek Watershed District does not have any regulatory authority over <br />road salt. The watershed district simply provided informational material on salt and its impact. <br />Councilmember Strub inquired how hours of operation and noise concerns would be regulated by the City. <br />Planning Director Gundlach explained that if the applicant was not complying with the conditions within a <br />Special Use Pernmit, the City could review the matter with the applicant and the permit could be revoked. City <br />Attorney Gilchrest advised that now was the opportunity for the Council to add conditions to the Special Use <br />Permit. <br />Planning Director Gundlach clarified that staff approved of the applicant's current salt storage shed (40' x 40) <br />and sales. However, staff was not in agreement with expanding this use to a 10,000 square foot shed and <br />transfer facility. <br />Jim Yarosh, counsel for MPI, reported that he has been working with staff for months and months on this <br />issue. He believed that the road salt should be viewed as just another pile of material being stored on the site. <br />It was his opinion that the proposed road salt expansion would impact the environment and the adjacent <br />sensitive areas. He commented that outdoor storage was allowed within this overlay district. He believed that <br />the unsightliness of the property could be addressed through the proposed plantings and berms that would be <br />completed by Mr. Murlowski. He discouraged the Council from denying the request simply because it <br />would be difficult to monitor the amount of salt on the site. <br />Mr. Murlowski reviewed several photos of MnDOT and municipal road salt storage sheds noting that all <br />were three sided. He did not believe that there was any reason to require a door. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen thanked Mr. Murlowski for capping the landfill. He asked how much sound <br />would be generated by unloading the railcars. Mr. Murlowski explained bottom dump rail cars would be <br />used to unload the road salt. Time road salt would be dropped onto a conveyor, which would be transferred to <br />the salt storage shed. He anticipated that the conveyor belt would be powered by a diesel engine, but would <br />be well within the site's decibel levels. He discussed the elevation change between his site and the adjacent <br />park trail. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned what direction the salt storage shed would face. Mr. Murlowski reported he <br />would prefer to have the open side of the shed would face east. <br />Councilmember Bauman did not view salt and dirt in the same manner. She believed that too much salt <br />would be toxic if it ran into the City's waterways. She wished that Mr. Murlowski would have approached <br />the City prior to purchasing the parcel from the railroad. She feared how New Brighton residents would be <br />impacted by having rail cars in this area of the City for five to eight hours a day. She asked who Mr. <br />Murlowski would be selling the road salt to and why he decided to expand this portion of his business. Mr. <br />Murlowski indicated he has current snow plow /road salt customers which led him to see a market for selling <br />road salt. He anticipated that he would not need any more than 10 or 12 rail deliveries a year. <br />Councilmember Bauman expressed concern with how the City would set a cap on the amount of road salt <br />being brought to this site. Planning Director Gundlach indicated the Planning Commission recommended the <br />amount be capped at 13,500 tons annually. Mr. Murlowski commented the 13,500 tons was a number <br />negotiated between him and staff. <br />Councilmember Bauman inquired if staffwould change its position on the monitoring of the salt on site if the <br />applicant were to provide the City with rail receipts. Planning Director Gundlach reviewed staff's concerns <br />again with the Council and noted the inability to regulate the amount of salt on site was just one of staff's <br />many concerns. She discussed the allowed uses in the I -1 zoning district. She explained that staffwanted to <br />see the site tightly monitored because it differed from all other light industrial uses in the City. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen questioned how much salt storage was on site at this time. Mr. Murlowski stated <br />he had between 1,000 to 3,000 tons or road salt each year. <br />Ray Lucas, President of Applewood Pointe, explained that his senior living cooperative was quote close to <br />Murlowski Properties. He reviewed several photos with the Council that showed the impact 13,500 tons of <br />salt would have on the property. He believed that salt piles should not be viewed in the same manner as <br />aggregate, due to the fact salt was soluble. He feared that spillage and contamination would occur. He <br />indicated that even if Mr. Murlowski was 99.9% efficient, it would mean that 27,000 pounds of salt was <br />spilled. Spillage consequences were then discussed and he was concerned that it only took one teaspoon of <br />road salt to contaminate five gallons of water. This concerned him because he lives on a lake. He questioned <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />