My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.08.18 PC Packet Combined
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2015
>
2015.08.18 PC Packet Combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2019 7:49:53 PM
Creation date
8/19/2015 1:51:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2) The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the <br />Zoning Ordinance. <br />There are no three story homes within the community that staff is aware of, however there <br />are many 2 '/ story homes. Noting this, staff is concerned about the effect community -wide <br />by permitting a third story. As such, staff is not convinced the proposed addition is <br />reasonable. There are other reasonable manners (a half story) in adding square footage to <br />the home that do not require a variance. <br />In reviewing whether the request is reasonable, it's worth acknowledging the overall square <br />footage is small at 236, with an additional 125 SF of deck space off the third floor. Also, the <br />applicant has designed roofpitches that allow the defined height of the structure to fit within <br />the 30' maximum allowed by Section 4-040. <br />3) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property and not created by <br />the landowner. <br />The request to add a third story for additional living space is driven by architectural <br />preference, which is a circumstance created by the landowner and not something unique to <br />the property. This type of home, on similarly sized -lots, is common in New Brighton. <br />4) The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. <br />Staff is not convinced this criterion is met. The effect of a third story could have <br />unanticipated consequences in the neighborhood, even though it still fits within the 30' <br />height maximum. Staff is not aware of any home within the community that has a similar <br />feature to what is proposed. <br />5) The variance shall not be granted solely because of economic considerations. <br />The applicant has indicated their proposal is based only on architectural preference and not <br />driven by economics. <br />To conclude, the City of New Brighton processes less than one variance a year and staff is <br />unaware of any building height or story variances for a single family homes. Staff is also not <br />aware of any other home within the community with a similar design feature, even the applicants <br />home type is typical to New Brighton. Because of the lack of similar requests, and because the <br />proposal does not meet the "practical difficulties" threshold based on staff's analysis, staff does <br />not recommend approving a variance to add a third story. <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION <br />Deny the request as submitted. <br />Janice Gundlach, Asst. Director of Community <br />Assets & Development/Planning Director <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.