Laserfiche WebLink
<br />., <br /> <br />y <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />.'.-f <br /> <br />.: <br /> <br />! <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 97 - 0 62 <br /> <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> <br />RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDING <br />APPROVAL OF VN-314 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, an application for a variance has been made by Robert Kallestad; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the procedural history of the application is as follows: <br /> <br />1. An application for a variance was filed with the City of New Brighton on June 27, <br />1997. <br /> <br />2. The Planning Commission, pursuant to published and mailed notices, held a public <br />hearing on July 15 and August I 9, 1997, and all persons present at the hearing <br />were given an opportunity to be heard. <br /> <br />3. The City Council considered aU information pertaining to VN-314 at its August <br />26, 1997 meeting. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council makes the following Findings <br />of Fact in respect to VN-314: <br /> <br />1. The property is zoned I-I, Light Industrial. <br /> <br />2. The required front yard setback for parking in the 1-1 district is 40 feet and the <br />required width for driving aisles is 18 feet. <br /> <br />3. The applicant proposed to construct four parallel parking stalls 23 feet from the <br />front property line with a l5 foot driving aisle behind such stalls. Therefore, a l7 <br />foot front yard variance and a 3 foot driving aisle variance would have been <br />required. <br /> <br />4. By reducing the number of parallel parking stalls to 3 stalls located north of the <br />existing ground sign located on the landscape berm and increasing the variance to <br />20 feet, it would be possible to have a full width driving aisle of 18 feet behind <br />the parking stalls. Such an adjustment would increase the safety of traffic <br />circulation in the parking lot without substantially increasing the impact of the <br />proposed variance. <br /> <br />5. A variance may be granted from the literal provisions of the Zoning Ordinance in <br /> <br />CLL12914Q <br />NE136-134 <br />