My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.02.03 WS Packet
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015.02.03 WS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2016 1:04:59 PM
Creation date
1/21/2016 10:54:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
regards to chickens, usually for odor or noise, and has successfully used City Code Chapter 17 <br />Nuisances to resolve the odor and/or noise issue. As mentioned above, residents have <br />approached the Council in regards to the keeping of chickens and other foul. Some residents feel <br />this issue must be addressed by adopting language which would place limits on the keeping of <br />fowl, while others believe the city should encourage "urban farming". <br />This issue is complicated because it impacts many core values for people and how they define <br />community. Common themes associated with the issue include: <br />• Property rights/individual liberty concerns <br />• Sustainability/locavore movement <br />• The attracting of predators; fox, raccoon, coyote, etc. <br />• Property values <br />• Watershed/runoff issues <br />• Animal welfare concerns <br />• Land use issues <br />Many cities throughout Minnesota have begun discussions or adopted ordinances in order to <br />address concerns or problems that raising animals in a residential setting can create. The <br />following offers greater detail: <br />Examples of Other Ordinances <br />Cities throughout Minnesota have come up with a variety of regulatory approaches to deal with <br />the issues associated with raising chicken/fowl. Some have banned it, require licenses or <br />permits; or prescribe specific standards such as the number of animals allowed, setbacks, and <br />other standards for the coop and chicken runs. The following are a list of cities and a brief <br />summary of what they have included in their ordinances. <br />For additional detail, copies of the ordinances from each city have been attached to this memo. <br />Golden Valley <br />Golden Valley currently doesn't allow any animals to be kept. Exceptions are made for cats, <br />dogs, gerbils, hamster, and caged household birds. Golden Valley staff was contacted in regards <br />to any pending changes to their ordinances. Golden valley is currently finalizing language that <br />will allow chickens and/or fowl; however final ordinance language is not available yet. <br />Minneapolis <br />Chickens, ducks, geese, turkeys, pigeons, or other "small animals" may be kept with the issuance <br />of an annual permit. The permit will only be issued if the applicant obtains written consent from <br />80% of the occupants of real estate located within 100 feet of the applicant's real estate. There is <br />a new 5 year permit available which discounts the price. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.