My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2015.03.10 CC Packet Combined
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2015
>
2015.03.10 CC Packet Combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2019 5:42:15 PM
Creation date
1/27/2016 1:53:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
68
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Jacobsen requested the Council now discuss roosters and the appropriate size of chicken coops. He was <br />in favor of not allowing roosters in the City. <br />Councilmember Burg and Councilmember Bauman agreed. <br />Councilmember Strub did not believe there were enough complaints to limit roosters in the City. <br />Councilmember Burg was in favor of limiting the number of chickens/fowls to eight to ten as this closely <br />reflected the number of chickens New Brighton residents already have. <br />Mayor Jacobsen suggested that lot size also be considered when setting a fowl limit. Gundlach reviewed the <br />average lot size for homes in New Brighton. <br />Councilmember Bauman discussed the research she has conducted regarding chickens and coops. She <br />reviewed some of the information she gathered from her research, along with the diseases these animals can <br />carry. She questioned how the City would address the disposal of chicken carcasses if a bird were to die. She <br />discussed the diseases chicken carried and noted their eggs were more likely to have salmonella. It was her <br />opinion that chickens did not belong in the suburbs or the City of New Brighton. <br />Councilmember Strub asked if the code required a yard to be fenced. Code Enforcement Officer Hatch <br />explained that the task force was recommending that chickens be restrained or have a place to run, but was not <br />requiring a yard to be fenced. <br />Mayor Jacobsen recommended the code include language that would require chickens to be restrained. <br />Councilmember Burg questioned if two neighbors could share a chicken coop. Code Enforcement Officer <br />Hatch believed that this would be allowed unless a complaint was brought to the City. Gundlach commented <br />that coops would have setback requirements. <br />Mayor Jacobsen discussed the requirements he has on a piece of farmland that he owns in Otter Tail County. <br />He stated he had more requirements on that land than he does on his New Brighton property with regard to <br />chickens. He was in favor of allowing eight chickens on a New Brighton lot. <br />Councilmember Burg suggested the number of chickens be based on the size of a homeowner's property. She <br />was in favor of allowing up to 24 chickens for residents with two -acre parcels. <br />Councilmember Bauman did not support this recommendation. <br />Mayor Jacobsen believed it would be important for residents to gain the approval of their neighbors prior to <br />having chickens. <br />Councilmember Strub questioned if any cities required notification of neighbors. Code Enforcement Officer <br />Hatch explained that the City of Minneapolis required 90% of neighbors within 100 feet to support the request. <br />He noted the task force discussed this matter but did not make this a recommendation due to the fact neighbors <br />could move away as time goes by. <br />Councilmember Bauman did not want to see New Brighton become the chicken capital of the Twin Cities. <br />She believed this matter needed further consideration. She understood homeowners had property rights, but <br />she also did not want to hurt residents' property values by having chicken coops everywhere. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.