Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Gundlach reported the City had the highest permit count ever in 2016. <br /> <br />Lotter reviewed the police division changes that would occur in the coming year. He understood the <br />community was very proud of the services provided by the Public Safety Department and the short response <br />times provided by both the Police and Fire. Further discussion ensued regarding the City’s paid on-call fire <br />department and Brightwood Golf Course. The City’s percentage spent on personnel was discussed. Staff <br />provided comment on the City’s property valuation, property tax levels and estimated revenues for the coming <br />year. He noted the Council’s next steps and reported the 2017 preliminary budget would be discussed again by <br />the Council on Tuesday, August 23rd. It was noted a preliminary levy would have to be approved by the <br />Council in September and the final levy would be approved in December. <br /> <br />Lotter discussed potential goals per department that were not included within the budget. It was noted the <br />Police Department would like additional Public Service Officers noting these individuals would assist license <br />police officers with community work. In addition, the Parks and Recreation Department would like to hire two <br />maintenance workers to improve the look of the maintenance of the City’s parks. The difference between 180 <br />day and part-time employees was discussed. He explained that staff was trying to perceive the needs of the <br />community to make New Brighton an even better community. <br /> <br />Lotter believed the proposed budget and levy was very competitive. He recommended the Council continue to <br />fund the CIP and allow for the additional staffing FTE’s. He then asked the Council for comments or <br />questions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strub appreciated seeing the needs and wants portions of the budget. He appreciated knowing <br />what staff wanted and looked forward to the Council reviewing these items further. Lotter believed that the <br />goals per department that were not included in the budget were all needs, not wants and would assist the City <br />in reaching a higher level of service. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jacobsen understood the revenue side of the budget was very conservative. He asked what the <br />biggest expense would be for the Community Center next year. Brueur anticipated the renovation of the <br />Eagle’s Nest would be the largest expense. She commented on how this project would impact revenues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strub wanted to better understand if or how the proposed staffing changes would improve <br />services for residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Burg was not comfortable with stating what she did not approve of within the budget. She <br />was uncertain of the City was properly maintaining its services, given the feedback she received at National <br />Night Out. She wanted to see the level of services maintained if not improved for New Brighton residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Bauman understood Community Development had a low increase and this stood out to her. <br />She thanked staff for that. At first look, she believed the levy increase was quite high, especially when <br />compared to Social Security. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jacobsen supported further investment into Parks and Recreation given the fact this <br />department was having increased revenues. However, he did not fully understand the financial impact of the <br />new employees and proposed reclassifications. Lotter described why he was seeking an Assistant City <br />Manager. He believed this position was necessary in order to keep the City covered fully at all times, while <br />also assisting in taking over a portion of his work load. <br /> <br />