My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016.10.11 WS Packet
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2016
>
2016.10.11 WS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2017 2:50:58 PM
Creation date
1/10/2017 2:49:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
126
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
revisiting, refreshing, and advancing previous New Brighton visions in a cost-effective manner. Also <br />worth noting, the $80,000 was a “not to exceed” quote. <br /> <br />Budgetary Impacts <br />During the budget process, staff anticipated additional financial impacts in years 2016, 2017, and 2018 <br />as a result of this project. Staff increased the projected 2016 professional services budget from $13,000 <br />to $20,000. In years 2017 and 2018, staff has budgeted $30,000 for professional services. The <br />professional services budget available in these years equates to $80,000. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation <br />As noted above, staff would not recommend selecting the Sambatek proposal for the reasons noted. <br />Staff finds that while NAC is capable of doing the work and could end of being the most cost-effective, <br />the depth of New Brighton knowledge HKGI has makes their proposal the staff preferred option. <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br /> New Brighton’s 2015 System Statement <br /> Sambatek Proposal <br /> NAC Proposal <br /> HKGi Proposal
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.