Laserfiche WebLink
<br />• Page 13 discusses the assumptions made with regard financial analysis. <br />• Page 14 provides recommendations based on the financial analysis completed. <br /> <br />Gundlach stated that based on the Recommendations noted on page 14, there are no immediate actions <br />that need to be taken with regarding to the overall financial health of New Brighton’s TIF program. Two <br />TIF districts are recommended to be more closely monitored, those being districts #26 & #33. Future <br />budget modifications may need to be made. This information is for review and discussion purposes <br />only. Ehler’s staff will provide a brief review of the information and the Commission is encouraged to <br />discuss the plan and provide feedback. <br /> <br />Jason Aarsvold, Ehlers, reviewed the TIF management plan in further detail with the EDC noting this <br />document was updated often in order to keep the City appraised of the financial situation. <br /> <br />Jeanne Vogt, Ehlers, described the circumstances in which tax increment surplus was returned to the <br />City. She then discussed the City’s policy for using surplus tax increment. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the City’s TIF budget, existing interfund loans, the tax base and <br />existing TIF districts. <br /> <br />Chair Zisla requested further information on the municipal development fund. Gundlach discussed the <br />history and use of the municipal development fund with the EDC, describing how this fund assisted the <br />City with redevelopment. Mr. Aarsvold explained the goal would be to replenish this fund over time in <br />order to continue redevelopment projects. <br /> <br />Chair Zisla questioned how the City’s TIF budgets were at this time. Mr. Aarsvold believed the City’s <br />TIF budgets were fine at this time, but would continue to be monitored. He appreciated the City’s <br />ongoing efforts to review and address their TIF Districts. <br /> <br />New Brighton Exchange Financial Dashboard <br />Gundlach explained Ehler’s recently updated the New Brighton Exchange Dashboard, which is a <br />financial tool staff, the EDC, and Council use to understand the financial impact of the New Brighton <br />Exchange, development block by development block. The dashboard reflects realized development <br />and/or projected development, year built or projected to be built, finished market values, and total <br />estimated TIF. The bottom line of the dashboard reflects a variety of spreadsheets regarding TIF <br />collection, bond payments, and projected repayments to the City’s Municipal Development Fund, also <br />referred to as Fund 460. <br /> <br />Gundlach reported this dashboard was originally developed to understand the minimum development <br />necessary to generate enough tax increment to pay back the bonds, also referred to as the “break even” <br />or “minimum development” scenario. Over the last couple of years it has become apparent New <br />Brighton Exchange has enough development to generate adequate tax increment to pay back the bonds. <br />This allows staff, the Commission, and Council to focus on repayment of the Municipal Development <br />Fund loan. The greater capacity to repay principal and interest of the interfund loan, which is currently <br />valued at approximately $12 million, the more able financially the City will be to undertake future <br />redevelopment projects. The updated dashboard reflects a cash balance at the end of year 2035, the year <br />the TIF districts expire, of $11,720,799. The updated dashboard takes into consideration the following <br />revisions from the previous dashboard reviewed by the Commission and Council: <br /> <br />• Pay 2016 values and collected tax increment, assuming 100% collection <br />• Pay 2017 values and projected tax increment, using Pay 2016 tax rates and assuming 100% <br />collection <br />• The timing of development for Blocks E and F was moved from 2017 to 2019