My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2016.10.18 PC Combined
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2016
>
2016.10.18 PC Combined
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2017 11:21:09 AM
Creation date
1/11/2017 10:59:15 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• It should be clarified that temporary family health care dwellings would only be allowed on <br />properties with R-1 and R-1A zoning (single family residential). <br />• What mechanisms would be put in place to ensure water connections do not freeze? <br />• What kinds of aesthetic standards are appropriate? Staff recommends this standard be very <br />specific as the types of exterior materials that are acceptable as these dwellings could vary <br />greatly from a typical “tiny home” to a dated manufactured home (or maybe even a recreational <br />vehicle). The state law refers to the Industrialized Building Commissions seal and data plate or <br />American National Standards Institute Code, which govern modular-type construction. <br />• How to ensure their removal? Staff finds this item to of the biggest concern as it wouldn’t be <br />publicly palatable to require a mentally or physically impaired person to vacate their home if <br />they do not willingly leave. <br />• The law provides for an initial 6 month timeframe, with one 6-month extension period, for a <br />total of 12 months. Does this commission find this timeframe to be acceptable? <br />• State law limits permit fees to $100 for the initial, and $50 for a renewal. Is this adequate to <br />cover staff review? <br />• In order to meet Council’s directive of providing an expedited permit, it likely is not reasonable <br />to require a public hearing or Commission or Council approvals. Does the Commission find that <br />an administrative review is acceptable? <br /> <br />Staff recommends the Commission discuss the above bulleted points in an effort to try and build <br />consensus surrounding additional local regulations beyond the State’s standards. Staff recognizes this <br />discussion might require additional work sessions, thus Commission members should feel free to ask lots <br />of questions, and if necessary, request additional materials/research from staff. <br /> <br />Attachments <br /> Ordinance No. 845 <br />8/10/2016 PC Materials & Attachments <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.