Laserfiche WebLink
April 25, 2017 Page 5 of 10 <br />recommended these conditions be removed from the SUP. <br />Mayor Johnson commented on Condition 8 and recommended the City not limit the amount oftraffic on any <br />street. She requested further information on the Condition that addressed the neighborhood use ofthe <br />seminary property. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development/Planning Director Gundlach <br />explained the seminary welcomes the neighborhood children to use their property for play space and this <br />condition addressed this matter. <br />Peter Beck, United Theological Seminary, stated this condition concerned him. He questioned why the <br />neighborhood would have no restrictions on the playground use, but the potential school tenant would. <br />Mayor Johnson commented on Condition 12 and believed that the potential new school tenant should be able <br />to call for public safety services whenever they have an emergency. She found Condition 12 to be insulting. <br />She suggested that if a mitigation plan was deemed necessary by the Public Safety Director that this be <br />worked out between the school tenant and the Public Safety Department. <br />Councilmember Strub commented the 12 conditions drafted by staff addressed the concerns raised by the <br />neighbors. With that being said, he also understood the neighbors took advantage ofthe seminary property, <br />visited the farmer's market and greatly enjoyed having the seminary in their neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Burg stated she could support the removal ofthe Conditions that were encumbrances. She <br />commented there was a park across the street from the theological seminary and it was used well into the <br />evening hours and on weekends without restriction. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen recommended the seminary have the same hours of operation as a City parte. He <br />agreed that some ofthe conditions for approval were quite onerous. He appreciated the fact that the City was <br />working to strike a balance with the neighbors. <br />Councilmember Bauman indicated she was not anti -seminary. She believed the seminary was a great <br />neighbor to the community. She stated she would rather see another proposal from the seminary on how to <br />better utilize their space. <br />Councilmember Strub asked how the Council could amend the motion on the table. City Manager Lotter <br />recommended the Council make an amendment to the motion on the floor. City Attorney Sonsalla requested <br />the Council make separate motions for each Condition. <br />AMENDMENT: Motion by Councilmember Strub, seconded by Councilmember Burg, to remove <br />Condition 6 from the SUP for the United Theological Seminary at 3000 5th Street NW. <br />4 Ayes, l Nay (Bauman opposed) -Amendment Carried <br />AMENDMENT: Motion by Councilmember Strub, seconded by CouncHmember Burg, to remove <br />Condition 8 from the SUP for the United Theological Seminary at 3000 51h Street NW. <br />4 Ayes,1 Nay (Bauman opposed) -Amendment Carried <br />AMENDMENT: Motion by Counedmember Strub, seconded by Councihnember Burg, to remove <br />Condition 9 from the SUP for the United Theological Seminary at 3000 5 I Street NW. <br />Councilmember Jacobsen suggested the hours for the playground hours be similar to those of a City Park. <br />City Manager Lotter recommended the Council act on the amendment on the table and make an additional <br />amendment to the motion setting the playground hours. <br />4 Ayes, l Nay (Bauman opposed}Amendment Carried <br />AMENDMENT: Motion by Councilmember Strub, seconded by Councilmember Burg, to remove <br />JI Condition 12 from the SUP for the United Theological Seminary at 3000 5th Street NW. <br />4 Ayes,1 Nay (Bauman opposed) -Amendment Carried <br />