Laserfiche WebLink
o A fee amount to be determined by the City's annual Fee Schedule (not set by Ordinance). This allows <br />the City to adjust the fee as experience dictates reasonable fee amounts. <br />o A Guarantee of Removal requirement. This requires the licensee to enter into a legally binding <br />agreement requiring removal of the temporary dwelling. The agreement requires a financial deposit and <br />permission for the City (or our designee) to enter the property to remove the temporary dwelling. <br />Planning Director Gundlach explained the draft ordinance is being reviewed by the City Attorney. If comments <br />are received in time for the work session discussion, they will be forwarded to the Commission. Staff <br />recommends the Commission discuss the draft ordinance and suggest any gaps in regulation and/or needed <br />revisions. Next steps will be discussed based on the Commission's level of concern/comfort with the draft <br />ordinance and City Attorney comments. She requested the Commission provide staff with questions or <br />comments. <br />Chairperson Nichols-Matkaiti requested clarity on the ADA accessibility requirements. Planning Director <br />Gundlach discussed the differences between accessibility and ADA requirements and stated she would speak <br />further with the City's Building Official regarding this matter. <br />Commissioner McPherson questioned if travel trailers would be allowed on properties. Planning Director <br />Gundlach asked if the Commission believed this should be allowed if not accessible. <br />Commissioner McPherson stated travel trailers would not meet the City's objective for temporary family health <br />care dwelling units. <br />Commissioner Danger asked how many permits the City would issue for these units. Planning Director <br />Gundlach explained the City could not limit these units to certain vendors and indicated the units could be <br />purchased, leased or rented. <br />Commissioner Deick inquired if a differentiation could be made between temporary health care units and travel <br />trailers/mobile homes. Planning Director Gundlach commented the state was licensing the health care units. <br />She reviewed Item 7 on the proposed Ordinance noting the health care unit would have to have exterior building <br />materials that were compatible with residential houses. She commented that all residential setbacks would have <br />to be met for the placement of the health care units. She anticipated the likelihood of a unit coming into New <br />Brighton would be limited due to this requirement. <br />Commissioner Deick recommended the Ordinance require these units to only being placed on residential <br />properties and not church, commercial or institutional. Planning Director Gundlach stated the Ordinance <br />currently had no zoning limitations. She explained it does require the property owner and occupant to sign the <br />City's application. <br />Commissioner Danger questioned if the occupant of the health care unit had to be a family member. Planning <br />Director Gundlach reviewed the requirements within the Ordinance, noting this was not the case. She stated if a <br />person was acting as a health care agent or legal guardian for an individual, the individual would be allowed on <br />the property. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the differences between travel trailers and temporary family health care <br />dwellings. <br />PA <br />