My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2017.05.16 Planning
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2017
>
2017.05.16 Planning
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2018 11:41:18 AM
Creation date
1/11/2018 11:25:00 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
115
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
West: Vacant Land <br /> <br />SITE PLAN ANALYSIS <br />Per Zoning Code Section 8-010, Site Plan approval is required for construction of new buildings <br />or structures other than single and double family residences. The purpose of the Site Plan <br />approval is to evaluate the plan’s conformance with applicable zoning regulations. The analysis <br />below summarizes the proposed plan’s conformance with underlying NBE, New Brighton <br />Exchange zoning district standards of Chapter 6, Article 6 of the Zoning Code. Because a PUD <br />is requested, there will be some deviations from the requirements of the NBE Zoning Code and <br />those areas will be specified in the analysis below. <br /> <br />Use/Building Type <br />The applicant is proposing a building of approximately 37,000 SF, of which the use breakdown <br />is as follows: <br /> <br />Office: 12,600 SF (34%) <br />Testing & Certification: 24,000 SF (66%) <br />Total: 36,600 SF (100%) <br /> <br />The Building Type regulations within the NBE district slated Block D for office. Nearly two <br />years ago, the Economic Development Commission considered the prospect of an “industrial <br />flex” user on Block D based upon more heavy industrial uses to the north and northeast and <br />based on the more aggressive industrial market when compared to the office market. After <br />understanding what industrial flex users might look like, the recommendation was to proceed <br />with this type of user, in addition to 100% office. This recommendation was based upon the low <br />impacts of industrial flex users, the quality of construction being higher than a typical industrial <br />user, and to realize development sooner while also meeting the intent of the NBE district <br />standards. Staff would recommend allowing a 34% office / 66% testing & certification use <br />through the PUD. <br /> <br />Building Setbacks/Build-To Line <br />Section 6-710 (1) Required Proposed <br />Front (14th ST NW) Minimum 10’, Maximum 40’ 103’* <br />Rear (south) 15’ 34’ <br />Side (west) 0’ 190’ <br />Side-Street (Northwest <br />Parkway) Minimum 10’, Maximum 40’ 100’* <br />Expansion = 10’ <br /> <br />The principal structure setbacks to the front (14th ST NW) and side street (Northwest Parkway) <br />are much greater than the minimum and maximum setbacks established in Section 6-710 (1). <br />The minimum and maximum standard was intended to force building placement up near the <br />road. Several projects within New Brighton Exchange have been approved with a greater <br />setback. This is a deviation that can be permitted through the PUD. Staff recommends approval <br />of the increased setback as several projects have been permitted a similar building placement, the <br />market has not supported the building placement originally envisioned for the New Brighton
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.