Laserfiche WebLink
would be holding a Neighborhood Meeting at Freedom Park on Thursday, March 22nd from 6:00 to 7:30 <br />p.m. She noted those in attendance would receive an update on the City's water, the Korean Church <br />property and even year elections. <br />VI. Old Business <br />(A) Consideration of Special Use Permits to allow placement of fill in the floodplain, coupled with <br />creation of compensatory storage, and construction of a detached garage in excess of 624 SF at <br />936 SF at 1244 Long Lake Road. <br />Planning Director Janice Gundlach reported During the February 20, 2018 Planning Commission public <br />hearing regarding Mr. Tim Miller's request to construct a detached garage larger than 624 SF, a <br />neighbor (Andra Storla — 1248 Long Lake Road), presented information suggesting the property was <br />being used illegally as a duplex. Due to Special Use Permit requirement 8-130 (e) that states "the special <br />use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is <br />located", the Planning Commission tabled action to allow staff to work with the City Attorney and <br />applicant to determine if the home was being used illegally as a duplex. Beyond the duplex concern, <br />there was a concern that too many unrelated adults lived in the single-family home. More specifically, <br />Zoning Code Section 2-020(29) (C) defines "family" for the purpose of a "single family home" as "a <br />group of not more than four persons not so related, maintaining a single housekeeping unit". <br />Planning Director Gundlach reported since the February 20, 2018 Planning Commission meeting, staff <br />has talked with the applicant and the City Attorney about how to resolve these issues. Regarding the <br />duplex concern, staff has concluded: <br />■ The applicant has not made any permanent, structural changes to the home that would make the <br />home into a duplex. Rather, a locked door separates the lower and upper levels. <br />• The lower level of the home was finished as a "mother-in-law" suite with separate kitchenette. It <br />is not unusual for a New Brighton home to have a kitchenette or wet -bar in the lower level (or <br />anywhere in the home) in addition to a regular kitchen. <br />• Only one address exists. <br />• Only one water and electrical service exists. <br />Planning Director Gundlach indicated based on the above bulleted items, and after consulting with the <br />City Attorney, staff would not consider the home a duplex. If the home isn't a duplex, this leaves the <br />issue of making sure the occupants of the home meet the definition of family per Zoning Code Section <br />2-020(29) (C). During the hearing, the applicant admitted to having leases with five unrelated adults. <br />After the meeting, the applicant advised staff that he would immediately terminate a lease with one of <br />the five, bringing occupancy to the maximum of four unrelated adults. <br />Planning Director Gundlach stated based on the concerns of the neighbor and the information the <br />applicant provided regarding how to resolve these two matters, staff inquired with the City Attorney on <br />how best to ensure continued compliance moving forward. As staff suspected, the City Attorney <br />recommended the applicant provide an affidavit stating the home can only be used as a single-family <br />residence, that only four unrelated adults are allowed to maintain a single housekeeping unit, and the <br />applicant only has leases of four adults. This signed affidavit is attached and has been reviewed and <br />accepted by the City Attorney. It was noted a new Resolution has been drafted with an additional <br />W <br />