Laserfiche WebLink
b. That the special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property <br />in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially <br />diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Staff finds this criterion to be met. Use of a detached garage of this size is a common <br />attribute for residentially used properties. <br /> <br />c. That the establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly <br />development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the <br />district. <br /> <br /> Staff finds this criterion does not apply as the entire area is fully developed. <br /> <br />d. That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or <br />are being provided. <br /> <br /> Staff finds this criterion to be met. The applicant intends to construct a new concrete <br />slab for the proposed garage, but not a full driveway. Existing utilities and access <br />roads are sufficient. At the time of building permit, the applicant will be required to <br />maintain drainage in a manner to not negatively affect neighboring property. If the <br />applicant wishes to construct a full driveway, a curb cut permit must be obtained. <br /> <br />e. That the special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations <br />of the district in which it located. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. The proposed garage addition meets all required <br />setbacks and will not place the lot out of compliance with impervious surface (50%), <br />structural coverage (30%), or height standards (30’). <br /> <br />Thus, staff has determined the proposed garage meets all Special Use Permit standards as noted <br />above. <br /> <br />NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT ANALYSIS <br />The applicant proposes to construct a 792 SF detached garage. The survey submitted by the <br />applicant shows the existing home located within the 30 foot front yard setback. Because of this <br />nonconformity, a Nonconforming Use Permit is required. <br /> <br />The following nonconformities are present on site: <br />• Front yard setback of approximately 28.9’ when 30’ is normally required (principal <br />structure). <br />• Side street yard setback of 15.0’ when 30’ is normally required (shed 1). <br />• Side street yard setback of 19.8’ when 30’ is normally required (shed 2). <br /> <br />Section 8-460 of the Zoning Code allows a nonconformity to continue or expand if one or more <br />of the following condition are met (staff responses in italics): <br /> <br />A. The total number of nonconformities is reduced. <br />