My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018.05.15 PC
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2018
>
2018.05.15 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 11:26:00 AM
Creation date
4/2/2019 11:03:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
134
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
not separated. Staff does not find it to be reasonable to lose parking spaces or to merge <br />traffic to meet the 30’ setback when the reduced setback is only necessary for maneuvering <br />space for the school buses and safety to pedestrians and students would decrease. Lastly, <br />staff suspects the surrounding neighborhood, who is impacted during school events with <br />on-street parking, would oppose a reduction in off-street parking stalls. <br /> <br />2) The property owner proposes to use the property in a Reasonable Manner, i.e. Reasonable <br />Use. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. Schools are already a specially permitted use in <br />residential neighborhoods and Highview has existing in this location for many years. A <br />12.6’ Variance to ensure bus maneuvering space seems reasonable given the other <br />circumstances at play and that the 12.6’ variance area will not be used for parking. Staff <br />additionally recommends the applicant post this curve with “No Parking, Subject to <br />Towing” signs to mitigate the negative impact of having cars semi-permanently parked <br />within the variance area. A topographic grade change of approximately 10’ is present that <br />should prevent headlights from shining into the only home present to the west. Additional <br />landscape screening for headlights could be considered. <br /> <br />3) The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property, i.e. Applying <br />to the Property. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met due to the location of the existing track, building, and <br />roadways providing access to the property. Staff acknowledges the landowner had control <br />over the building location and track, but those decisions were made many years ago and in <br />order to evolve with increased enrollment, demanding 1-2 additional buses, the plight of <br />the landowner in needing the variance is now due to circumstances applying to the <br />property, which cannot be practically changed. <br /> <br />4) The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential Character of the Locality. <br /> <br />Staff find this criterion to be met. The Variance will not alter the character of the locality <br />and the parking lot encroachment of 12.6’ into the required 30’ western side yard will <br />likely not be noticed by most surrounding property. The other effects of the parking lot <br />reconstruction will positively impact the area. <br /> <br />5) Variances shall only be permitted when they are in harmony with the general purposes and <br />intent of the ordinance and when the variances are Consistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Staff finds this criterion to be met. Highview Middle School already exists and is <br />considered a specially permitted use. The school is also in compliance with the <br />Comprehensive Plan, which guides the property for Public/Quasi-Public uses. The intent <br />with the 30’ setback is to provide extra separation from non-residential uses to residential <br />uses. Staff would suggest an encroachment of 12.6’ into the setback does not dramatically
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.