My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018.11.20 PC
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2018
>
2018.11.20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 11:26:00 AM
Creation date
4/2/2019 11:18:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />REQUEST FOR COMMISISON CONSIDERATION <br /> <br />ITEM DESCRIPTION: VARIANCE & NONCONFORMING USE PERMIT. Request from Chad Johnson, <br />owner of Big Louie’s restaurant located at 790 County Road D West, to replace a <br />solarium that is legally nonconforming to setbacks with an enclosed room that <br />does not expand the building’s current footprint – PID: 32-30-23-43-0007 <br />DEPARTMENT HEAD’S APPROVAL: <br />CITY MANAGER’S APPROVAL: <br />No comments to supplement this report ___ Comments attached ___ <br /> <br />15.99 Deadline: 12/18/18 <br />Recommendations: Staff believes the variance can be approved with conditions. <br /> Template motions, recommended findings, and suggested conditions can <br />be found on pages 7 & 8 of the report <br />Legislative History: Application Received on 10/19/18 <br /> Planning Commission Public Hearing Scheduled for 11/20/18 <br />Financial Impact: None <br />Summary: The owner of Big Louie’s Restaurant, Chad Johnson, is seeking approval to <br />convert a legal nonconforming solarium on the eastern side of the building to <br />an enclosed room matching the remainder of the facility. The footprint of the <br />building will not change, but there will technically be an expansion of the <br />building upward within the required 30-foot setback thereby triggering the <br />need for a variance. Notably, the solarium was previously approved via <br />variance in 1987 for its current location, but a variance is once again triggered <br />due to expansion in an upward direction. Per staff’s analysis in the report, <br />the addition should only have a positive impact on this property and the <br />surrounding area. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Agenda Section: VI <br />Item: b <br />Report Date: 11/14/18 <br /> Commission Meeting Date: 11/20/18
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.