My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018.11.20 PC
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2018
>
2018.11.20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 11:26:00 AM
Creation date
4/2/2019 11:18:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance and Nonconforming Use Request – Big Louie’s Restaurant <br />Planning Commission Report; 11-20-18 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />(cont.) Chapter 8, Article 4, Nonconforming Use. <br />Identifies the process by which a nonconforming use is to be examined if/when <br />changes are proposed on a property. <br /> <br />Existing & <br />Proposed <br />Setbacks: <br /> <br />B-3 Required Existing Proposed <br />Front (CR D) 30 ≈ 31 ≈ 31 <br />Side (Hwy 88) 30 13 13 <br />Side (Long Lk Rd) 30 ≈ 15 ≈ 15 <br />Rear (north) 30 ≈ 210 ≈ 210 <br /> The existing setbacks will not change as a result of the proposed improvements. <br /> <br />Coverage <br />Analysis: <br /> Building coverage is not applicable in the B-3 district. <br /> Impervious surface coverage is not applicable in the B-3 district. <br /> <br />FAR Analysis: The building is (and will be) conforming to the allowed 1.0 floor area ratio <br />within the B-3 zoning district. <br /> <br />Flood Plain <br />Analysis: <br /> The subject parcel is not within a floodplain. <br /> <br />Shoreland <br />Issues: <br /> There are no variances to Shoreland standards being requested. <br /> <br />Building Height: The maximum height of structures in the B-3 district is two stories or 36 feet, <br />whichever is less. <br /> The building and proposed addition are conforming to the height maximum. <br /> <br /> <br />Nonconforming Use Variance Review: <br />APPLICANT <br />Project Narrative: <br />I am requesting to remove the solarium and turn it into an enclosed interior, using the same <br />measurements and existing foundation. No change in the square feet. <br /> <br />Criteria <br />Analysis: <br /> <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting a 17’ variance from the required 30’ setback from the <br />right-of-way for Highway 88. By state statute, there are three definitive criteria that <br />all variances must address: consistency with the ordinance, consistency with the <br />comprehensive plan, and the establishment of “practical difficulties.”
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.