My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2018.11.20 PC
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2018
>
2018.11.20 PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2019 11:26:00 AM
Creation date
4/2/2019 11:18:10 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2 <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request based on the <br />applicant’s submittals and findings of fact; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City Council considered on November 27th, 2018, the recommendations of the <br />Planning Commission, Staff, the Applicant's submissions, the contents of the staff report, and other <br />evidence available to the Council. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of New Brighton <br />hereby approves the requested nonconforming use variance based on the following findings of fact: <br />1. The subject property is guided for commercial business use by the comprehensive plan, and <br />has been the location of a restaurant for decades. <br />2. The subject property is zoned B-3, General Business which requires a 30-foot setback from <br />adjacent rights-of-way. <br />3. The existing building has been granted multiple variances including but not necessarily <br />limited to: <br />a. September 26, 1972: allowing a setback of 20 feet from Highway 88; <br />b. July 28th, 1987: allowing a setback of 13 feet from Highway 88; <br />c. November 24, 1987: allowing a 15-foot variance from Long Lake Road. <br />4. The proposed addition would replace the existing solarium with an enclosed room matching <br />the remainder of the facility from the inside and out. <br />5. The footprint for the proposed addition will match the footprint of the solarium previously <br />approved by variance in 1987, and the only expansion within the setback will be in an <br />upward direction. <br />6. The proposed improvement is in harmony with the comprehensive plan as it will enhance the <br />building and will not impact surrounding properties. <br />7. The request is reasonable as it will not expand the existing nonconformity previously <br />authorized by variance towards adjacent rights-of-way. <br />8. The landowner was not responsible for the initial construction of the solarium within the <br />setback. <br />9. The proposed improvements will not have a negative impact on the essential character of the <br />locality. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.