Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Scott Nichols, 126 Windsor Court, asked if the City has made any effort to understand how the <br />community defines diversity. He stated with 80% of the units being subsidized he believed it would <br />be important for the community to better understand this topic. <br />Fred Hoff, 690 6th Avenue NW, explained he believed the proposed development was not suited for <br />the site. He discussed how his views would be impacted by the extremely tall senior housing <br />building. He commented on the complaints that have been posted on the web for Pulte Homes and <br />Dominium. He indicated the mass transit in New Brighton was not fully adequate and questioned if <br />either apartment complex had adequate parking. He discussed how loud the passing trains were and <br />stated he feared how the new residents would be impacted by the train traffic/noise. <br />Becky Bates, 718 10th Avenue NW, stated she lived three blocks from the proposed development. <br />She explained it has become apparent to her that the residents of New Brighton were not being <br />heard. She believed the message from City Hall was that this development was what the citizens of <br />New Brighton wanted. She questioned where the evidence was to prove this case. She indicated she <br />witnessed over 50 residents speak against the proposal in January of 2019 and had yet to see a <br />resident speak in favor of the development. She was of the opinion the proposed development was <br />too dense for the 12 acres of land. She asked why her neighborhood was being asked to bear the <br />brunt of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. <br />Karen Meyer, Director of the Community Support Center, explained her non-profit agency was <br />supported by 11 local churches, community organizations and individuals. She discussed how her <br />agency worked to prevent evictions through referrals and financial aid. She stated working at CSC <br />she has noticed a severe affordable housing shortage in the City and many residents cannot find <br />housing they can afford. She reported the CSC supports the proposed plan and recommended the <br />Commission adopt the plan. <br />Diane Christofferson, 704 9th Avenue NW, stated she lives one block from the proposed <br />development. She explained she would like to have a dog park, soccer field, baseball field and one- <br />level senior housing development built on this land. She reported this land has always given back to <br />the community and she recommended this continue. She recommended that the City’s outstanding <br />debt be completely paid down prior to the City considering to spend additional funds on new <br />developments. She encouraged the City Council to be good stewards of the City’s money. <br />Tony Doroff, 518 9th Avenue NW, stated he grew up in New Brighton and attended the New Brighton <br />Elementary School. He estimated a 10-foot retaining wall would be installed near the apartment <br />building and would be less than 20 feet away from the apartments. He commented on how the <br />retaining wall would block the views from the first-floor apartments. He indicated the City was in <br />need of affordable housing and stated the proposed townhouses should not be considered <br />affordable. <br />Colin McCarty, 754 9th Avenue NW, stated he feared the parking from this development would spill <br />over into his neighborhood. <br />Ben Jones, 631 17th Avenue NW, reported he lived four or five blocks from the proposed <br />development. He questioned why the City was note requiring the developer to meet typical parking <br />and setback requirements within the Zoning Code. He explained he did not understand why there <br />was a desire for such a high level of density. He stated he appreciated the presentation from the <br />developer but believed the interests of the developers did not align with the best interests of the