Laserfiche WebLink
29 <br /> <br />days of sending it to the tenant.93 Such reporting requirements allow proactive outreach by city <br />government to share information and resources that may allow tenants to avoid eviction and <br />displacement. They also allow enable real-time data collection to better understand where and <br />why evictions are happening. Other ordinances connect just cause to relocation benefits. For <br />example, San Francisco’s ordinance requires landlords to provide relocation benefits when they <br />evict tenants for a subset of the just causes.94 Uniquely, Portland allows no-cause evictions and <br />non-renewals but only when landlords pay relocation fees.95 <br /> <br />Challenges to Just Cause Protections <br /> <br />There are many critics of extending just cause protections. The primary arguments for <br />not passing just cause ordinances revolve around two issues – first, that just cause is not needed; <br />and secondly, that it is an undue burden for housing providers. <br /> <br />Critics argue that just cause protections, particularly in a state that does not allow rent <br />control, is not needed nor effective in reducing displacement of low income tenants. Opponents <br />point to the fact that the majority of evictions are filed because of nonpayment of rent, a “just <br />cause” for termination of tenancy, rather than retaliation or other issues that just cause protection <br />would attempt to eradicate. However, as mentioned above, just cause protections are not <br />directed at formal evictions, but are targeted at the “informal” lease termination or nonrenewal, <br />the cases where court is not implicated. These are the cases where retaliation is most prevalent, <br />and they are unlikely to make it to a courtroom. It is hard to estimate how many households this <br />would affect, since it is hard to collect data on private housing provider notices of termination; <br />however, the qualitative data from legal service providers demonstrates that the fact that a <br />housing provider can give notice to tenants of a termination of lease without the requirement of a <br />reason has a chilling effect on tenants asserting such rights as contacting inspections or making <br />repair requests. <br /> <br />The second issue that opponents raise is that requiring good cause to end a lease may <br />have the effect of housing providers taking less risks in renting to tenants that may not meet all <br />screening standards. Providers argue that the ability to give a notice to terminate or not renew a <br />lease without a reason allows an “out” when a tenant is not working out well, there are <br />personality conflicts, or there are other issues that may not rise to the level of “good cause,” but <br />that make it a difficult working relationship. If a city opts to create a just cause protection <br />ordinance, there may be additional incentives that cities can provide to encourage housing <br /> <br />93 The Boston City Council approved the ordinance in 2017 after removing the just cause <br />requirements. A home-rule petition, the ordinance failed to get the required State approval in <br />2018. Meghna Chakrabarti & Jamie Bologna, How Boston’s Big Attempt at Rental Law Reform <br />Failed, WBUR, May 16, 2018, http://www.wbur.org/radioboston/2018/05/16/jim-brooks- <br />housing-act-recap. <br />94 CAREY LUCIA DUNFEY, WE SHALL NOT BE MOVED: ADVOCACY AND POLICY IN A RAPIDLY <br />CHANGING BOSTON 45 (2017). <br />https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/111387/1003291719-MIT.pdf?sequence=1 <br />95 Portland Housing Bureau, Mandatory Renter Relocation Assistance, CITY OF PORTLAND <br />OREGON, https://www.portlandoregon.gov/phb/74544.