2020.08.18 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

9 Mr. Valtinson stated this was his dilemma. Mr. Mattson reiterated the fact that the sound wall would cover Mr. Valtinson’s current sign. Motion by Commissioner Frischman, seconded by Commissioner Enanaa to close the Public Hearing. A roll call vote was taken. Approved 7-0. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti discussed the expansion of the non-conforming sign and questioned how the Planning Commission wanted to proceed. Commissioner Biedenfeld believed the applicant was proposing to expand the non-conformity. He commented on the difference between a wall sign and a sign installed on a pole. He indicated the proposed sign would more greatly impact the neighbors. He explained he would have a difficult time breaking away from City Code for this request. Commissioner Enanaa stated this was an expanded non-conformity. Commissioner Frischman explained she agreed with Commissioner Biedenfeld. Commissioner McQuillan discussed the concerns of the neighborhood and stated he was not in favor of expanding the non-conformity. Commissioner Nelsen stated he sympathized with the plight of the business owner, but he agreed with the Commissioners that this would be an expansion of a non-conformity. For that reason, he would not be able to support the variance request. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti agreed. She asked if the Commission wanted to recommend approval of the height variance if the applicant were interested in amending the size of the sign to 36 square feet. Mr. Valtinson indicated he could support the variance moving forward in this manner. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti asked if the variance would have a sunset period. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola reported the variance would expire in one year of the Resolution being approved if it is not acted on. He commented if a sign were installed, the sign would not conform with code because of the special approval. He reviewed the motion the Commission should make to the City Council. Further discussion ensued regarding the procedure that was followed for motions and voting. Commissioner Biedenfeld stated the current sign was put in place in error and construction of anything other than a wall sign expands the current non-conformity. He recommended the sign be denied versus offering a hybrid solution. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola commented on the discussion she had with the City Attorney and noted the existing language gave the Planning Commission and City Council broad latitude for these situations.