My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2020.08.18 Planning Commission
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Planning
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2020
>
2020.08.18 Planning Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2021 10:57:36 AM
Creation date
2/16/2021 3:02:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Variance Request – WilsonWolf (2100 Old Highway 8) <br />Planning Commission Report; 8-18-20 <br /> <br /> <br />Page 6 <br />(cont.) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />active roadway). Because the City earlier this year approved an SUP authorizing <br />the potential for a roadway to be constructed directly north of this facility, it is <br />more than reasonable to conclude this proposed patio could be adjacent to an <br />active roadway in the future (and using the same logic above, potentially within <br />10 feet of the roadway). By enforcing zoning rules and denying the variance <br />request, this potential safety problem is avoided which is the intent of zoning. <br />Criteria not met. <br />2) Is the variance consistent with the Comprehensive Plan? <br />Applicant’s Statement: Our request fits several provisions of the Comprehensive Plan: LU 6.0 <br />calls to “Provide opportunitys for redevelopment, reinvestment, and infill, to support expanded <br />employment throughout the city, particularly within identified opportunity areas.” Wilson Wolf <br />has been able to triple its number of staff by moving from our former location at 33 5th Ave to <br />our new location; that’s approximately 27 new jobs that may now be accommodated. <br />LU 6.3 calls to “Acitively encourage redevelopment (private market driven) of blighted <br />properties, brouwnfileds, and marginally used industrial areas.” The 2100 Old Highway 8 <br />space was vacant for years, and as of about one year ago, the 2110 portion of the building <br />has been vacant. Improvements such as we plan which are visually appealing from the <br />outside, help creat a more intimate, less sterile environment and will be attractive to those <br />considering space around us. <br />LU 7.1 “Ensure that places of employment are desgined to be compatible with adjacent non- <br />employment land uses.” Because of the large distance between our building and the next <br />one North, and with the railroad tracks, trees and fields in-between, the patio we have had <br />designed is a perfect transition space between industrial work and the natural outdoors. <br />Staff Analysis: Staff whole-heartedly agrees with the applicant that the proposed <br />patio is well thought out, is a beautiful design, and would significantly <br />complement the Company’s new work space within the City. We also wish to <br />make it crystal clear that staff is greatly appreciative that WilsonWolf has found <br />a new home in New Brighton, and we always want to make the transition into a <br />new building a great experience. That said, there are limits to what we can do, <br />and this request unfortunately crosses one of those boundaries. <br />The Comp Plan establishes a broad blueprint for the City to follow, and zoning <br />adopts specific regulations to ensure the overall vision becomes a reality. While <br />we agree this relocation certainly improves the 2100 buiding and allows the <br />company to expand its employment base, we disagree with the applicant’s <br />reading of the various goals of the plan and how they play into this case. For <br />example, the applicant calles out land use goal 7.1 in support of the application <br />whereas staff would point to the same goal as a reason to deny the application. <br />Enforcing setbacks ensures places of employment are ultimately compatible with <br />adjacent land uses. Given the recent SUP approval granted to the adjacent
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.