Laserfiche WebLink
indicated staff does not have a great understanding about the number of short-term rentals that are operating in <br />New Brighton. He commented in 2020 there were multiple incidents that occurred at one property in particular, <br />which led staff to readdress this topic with the Council. He stated otherwise, he does not get a lot of complaints <br />about short-term rentals. He explained the Public Safety Department was in favor of the City regulating short- <br />term rentals for crime prevention and public safety purposes. He reported in the end, it was the Council's <br />prerogative to take action on an Ordinance of this type. <br />Councilmember Dunsworth stated she supported the City having regulations in place for short-term rentals. <br />She believed the City should be proactive in order to have regulations in place to address problem properties. <br />She supported the City pursuing a minimally invasive Ordinance, noting she did not support the overly <br />restrictive regulations in place in Roseville. She was of the opinion the City would be overstepping if it were to <br />regulate the number of people that could be in a house. <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas questioned how occupancy numbers are generated. Schlichting explained staff was <br />proposing the Building Official and Fire Marshall look at life safety issues when reviewing short-term rental <br />permits. These individuals would be able to set a safe number of occupants that should be allowed in a short- <br />term rental. Gozola indicated the City would not require an inspection for the proposed license. <br />Councilmember Abdulle stated he liked the balance within the proposed Ordinance. He asked if the City was <br />proposing to limit the number of occupants because there were concerns with large parties or was this being <br />done by other communities as well. Gozola commented it was his experience the one property that has <br />generated complaints, was because too many people were gathering at the property for a house party. He <br />stated one way for the City to address this concern would be to set an occupancy number. <br />Councilmember Allen anticipated there were plenty of properties that were renting out their properties with no <br />concerns. However, there was one property that was having problems. He explained he could support striking <br />the 10 occupant limit. <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas discussed the comments she has received from the public regarding short-term <br />rentals and if these properties were complying with sex offender registration requirements and adverse impacts <br />to property values. <br />Councilmember Dunsworth questioned what type of a process would be followed for a person that requests a <br />short-term rental license. Gozola reported the City could create a one page handout to license holders. He <br />stated he rents short-term rentals at least once a year and he has never had a background check completed on <br />him. <br />Councilmember Allen stated standard hotels do not require a background check. He indicated he appreciated <br />that the City would be tracking the short-term rental properties in the City and it was his hope these license <br />holders would be gathering contact information from renters. He supported treating short-term rentals in the <br />same or similar manners as hotels. <br />Councilmember Abdulle commented he supported the City having minimal processes in place, versus <br />overregulating short-term rentals. He explained the City would always be able to respond to complaints if <br />house parties were held and licenses could be pulled. He questioned how the City would address a short-term <br />rental that extended to 20 days. Gozola indicated this would be similar to the rental agreements multi -tenant <br />buildings have with their tenants and was between the property and the renter. <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the number of family members that could live in a house. <br />