Laserfiche WebLink
March 9, 2021 <br />project at the Public Hearing, staff will then prepare plans and specifications based on the input <br />received at the improvement hearing and previously collected information. Staff commented <br />further on the proposed improvements noting the streets within the project area were 31 years <br />old. The timeline for the project was reviewed with the Council and staff recommended <br />acceptance of the feasibility study and to call for the public improvement hearing for Street <br />Rehabilitation Project 21-1. <br />Councilmember Abdulle requested further information regarding the history of the assessment <br />terms for other street improvement projects. Director of Community Assets and Development <br />Schlichting discussed the process followed for assessing property owners. He noted the City has followed a <br />10 year repayment period at 3%. He explained residents can prepay their assessment prior to the assessment <br />being certified with the County. <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas questioned what the average assessment would be for these property owners. <br />Director of Community Assets and Development Schlichting estimated the average assessment would be <br />$2,500 for a benefiting property. <br />Councilmember Allen reported the City picks up 75% of the reconstruction costs for all street improvement <br />projects and residents are responsible for paying 25% of the costs. <br />Councilmember Abdulle asked if broken sidewalks and ADA ramps were typically included in the scope of a <br />project. Director of Community Assets and Development Schlichting explained if sidewalks are within the <br />project corridor that needed replacement this would be part of the project. He indicated broken panels would <br />be replaced in advance ofthe project. <br />Motion by Councilmember Abdulle, seconded by Councilmember Axberg to adopt a Resolution <br />accepting the Feasibility Study and calling for a Public Improvement Hearing on proposed Project 21- <br />1, 2021 Street Rehabilitation. <br />A roll call vote was taken. <br />5 Ayes, 0 Nays -Motion Carried <br />3. Consider Approval of Fountain Terrace Apartments Provisional License and Mitigation <br />Plan. <br />City Manager Massopust indicated Community Engagement Officer Krebsbach would be presenting this <br />item to the Council. <br />Community Engagement Officer Krebsbach stated as required by City Code Chapter 13, the New Brighton <br />Department of Public Safety reviewed police and fire calls to all licensed multi -family dwelling units in the <br />City for the time period of July 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. Included in this review was Fountain <br />Terrace Apartments located at 691- 7991` Avenue NW. The analysis of the calls for service at Fountain <br />Terrace revealed a level of .69 provisional calls for service per unit in that six month review period That level <br />is in excess of the .5 calls per unit that is allowed per City ordinance. Staff commented fiarther on the number <br />and types of calls for service from July through December 2020. Fountain Terrace provided a mitigation plan <br />that was revied by staff. Based on the review of the mitigation plan, staff recommends the plan be approved. <br />As part of their plan, Fountain Terrace will provide bi-weekly reports outlining their progress on the <br />mitigation plan they developed. It was noted staffwill continue to monitor activity at Fountain Terrace and <br />will work closely with management during the provisional period to verify they are in compliance with the <br />plan. <br />Councilmember Allen thanked staff for the thorough presentation. He commended staff for working with <br />NYFS for identifying issues and finding a new housing solution for one of the tenants at Fountain Terrace. He <br />stated he appreciated the efforts that went into the provisional license and mitigation plan. <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas questioned if the management at Fountain Terrace would be approving the <br />mitigation plan. Community Engagement Officer Krebsbach stated he was uncertain if this would occur but <br />noted he would be following up with them bi-weekly. <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />3. Consider Approval of <br />Fountain Terrace <br />Apmt=ts Provisional <br />License and Mitigation <br />Pian. <br />