My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2019.01.22 CC Minutes
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 2019
>
2019.01.22 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2021 10:02:47 AM
Creation date
5/13/2021 9:58:37 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
January 22,2019 Page 5 of 9 <br /> Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola stated State law provides cities with nine <br /> months to update zoning ordinances and maps following approval of a new comprehensive plan. The <br /> 1 recently approved 2040 Comp Plan will initiate that time clock,and approval of these two ordinances(865& <br /> 866)will be the first step in meeting the City's legal obligations. Both ordinances are needed at this time to <br /> allow developers to initiate the application process. Delaying either project(provided they meet the goals and <br /> objectives of the new plan)serves no public purpose. He explained the rezoning of these lands was not <br /> optional and reported the Ordinances were only granting conditional approval at this time. He commented <br /> further on the redevelopment plans for the Benedictine Health Center and discussed the feedback the <br /> Planning Commission received at their January 15th meeting. He stated after much discussion and <br /> consideration the Planning Commission recommended adoption of Ordinance 865. It was noted 275 notices <br /> were sent for this public hearing. <br /> City Manager Lotter explained he watched the most recent Planning Commission and heard the <br /> concerns that were voiced by the public. He addressed one of the concerns that was voiced at this <br /> meeting which was that no one knew about this project. He commented on the numerous efforts the <br /> City made to engage with the public and to gain feedback from residents for the 2040 Comprehensive <br /> Plan. It was noted this work began back in January of 2017. He reported there were community <br /> workshops, a social pinpoint was available on the City's website for six months, 16 different posts were <br /> made on Facebook that promoted the Comprehensive Plan, online surveys were conducted, newsletter <br /> articles were printed, and the City had a Comp Plan booth at Stockyard Days. He explained a <br /> neighborhood meeting was held with the developers in October of 2018 with over 270 notices were sent <br /> out. He encouraged the residents in attendance to contact Ben Gozola in order to speak with him <br /> further about their concerns. He stated Mr. Gozola has compiled a list of emails in order to keep these <br /> residents informed on this topic. He encouraged the residents in attendance to get on this email list. <br /> He explained he did not believe it was an accurate statement to say the City has not tried to <br /> communicate with the public regarding the Comprehensive Plan. He indicated he was open to <br /> discussing other avenues to communicate with the public if the current routes were not working. He <br /> commented on the growing need for senior housing in the community and reported the proposed <br /> apartment complex would be income restricted and not Section 8 housing. He explained the proposed <br /> $100 million development would not negatively impact property taxes. He stated an additional benefit <br /> would be this TIF District would have the opportunity to decertify early which meant the entire <br /> community would benefit by an enhanced tax base. He commented further on the process the City has <br /> followed for the redevelopment of the old New Brighton Elementary School and noted a number of <br /> development projects were considered by the City Council and staff. He reported with this was the <br /> same City Council and staff that got the City through the New Brighton Exchange clean up and <br /> redevelopment, the Dioxane concerns and explained this City Council and staff would not let the <br /> residents down on this redevelopment either. <br /> Mayor Johnson thanked staff for their thorough report on this request. <br /> Councilmember Jacobsen asked if this property could be rezoned to R-2. Assistant Director of <br /> Community Assets and Development Gozola explained the R-2 zoning district would not allow the <br /> developer to come forward with a project that meets the density requirement. He indicated the R-3B zoning <br /> district would allow for greater flexibility with respect to the density. <br /> 5 Ayes,0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> Motion by Councilmember Burg,seconded by Councilmember Jacobsen to adopt a Resolution <br /> ordering a summary publication for Ordinance 865. <br /> Councilmember Burg clarified that the full Ordinance would be available to the public on the City's website. <br /> 5 Ayes,0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> b.) Ordinance 866:An Ordinance Rezoning Land within the New Brighton <br /> Interchange(the former New Brighton Elementary School and surrounding <br /> lands)from R-1,B-3 and 1-2 to R-3B. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.