Laserfiche WebLink
December 10,2019 Page 4 of 9 <br /> The Public Hearing was opened at 7:21 p.m. <br /> Don Gerlach,73 20th Avenue NW,stated he has lived in New Brighton for over 23 years. He explained he <br /> did not support the proposed tax levy because it far exceeded the rate of inflation or the rate of how much <br /> income was increasing. He stated the City has increased the levy by 44%in the last four years. He <br /> commented he could not understand how a 10%increase was acceptable. He believed the proposed increase <br /> was too far ahead of the pace of residents'income. He encouraged the Council to be responsible with the <br /> levy growth rate and have it closer to 5%. He understood the City had great parks,staff and public facilities <br /> but he stated he would like the Council to be more considerate of the public when it comes to taxes. <br /> Jeffrey Nelson,690 8th Avenue NW,stated his house value went up 33%which meant his portion of New <br /> Brighton taxes would go up 33%. He reported his overall tax bill would be going up by 25.6%. He indicated <br /> this was outrageous. He indicated he has never received a 25%increase in his pay in one year and questioned <br /> how elderly residents were supposed to cover this large expense. He feared that residents his age would be <br /> forced out of the neighborhoods if the City continued to have tax increases that were approaching 10%. <br /> Mayor Johnson asked for additional comments,there were none. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Dunsworth,seconded by Councilmember Jacobsen to close <br /> the Truth In Taxation Hearing. <br /> 5 Ayes,0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> The Public Hearing was closed at 7:27 p.m. <br /> Council Business Council Business <br /> 1. Consider <br /> 1. Consider Resolution Adopting the Final 2020 Tax Levy. Resolution Adopting <br /> the Final 2020 Tax <br /> Acting City Manager Massopust indicated Finance Director Davitt would be presenting this item to the Levy. <br /> Council. <br /> Finance Director Davitt stated the 2020 General Fund Budget receives 56%of its total revenues from <br /> property taxes. The City Council approved a preliminary 2020 tax levy of$10,384,400 on September 10. <br /> This represents an additional investment of$871,290 from the levy payable in 2019. The preliminary 2020 <br /> tax levy was certified to Ramsey County and used in their calculations for their parcel specific notices mailed <br /> to each property owner. <br /> Councilmember Burg encouraged the residents with double digit property value increases to contact Ramsey <br /> County. She requested further information from staff about the programs that were available to provide <br /> assistance with property taxes.Finance Director Davitt explained Ramsey County had a senior deferral <br /> program. She encouraged residents to visit Ramsey County's webpage to learn more about this program. <br /> Councilmember Allen commented on how the value of homes in New Brighton was on the rise homes <br /> especially for homes valued at$300,000 or higher. <br /> Councilmember Jacobsen reported his house value went up 22%and his taxes would be going up by 18%. <br /> He indicated this was a great community to live in given the school district and services that were provided by <br /> New Brighton.He explained he viewed this as a double-edged sword because if he were to sell his home,the <br /> value would be higher,even though it meant his taxes would also be higher. <br /> Councilmember Burg stated the Council was apprehensive about the amount of money that was being set <br /> aside for debt free streets,but explained Council believed the long-term value to the City was worth the <br /> investment today. She described how staff worked to combine purchases and was innovative with requests in <br /> order to save the City money long-term. <br /> Councilmember Dunsworth explained her home was valued more than the median value home and she <br /> would be paying more in taxes. She reported she has looked through the budget through this lens. She <br /> commented one of the reasons the City had to have the proposed tax levy was because too many items were <br /> deferred during the lean years or recession. She understood the proposal was a lot,but noted the <br />