2021.11.23 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Commissioner Frischman reported this request was before the Commission for consideration because it was more than 624 square feet. She noted if the applicant would have requested a garage smaller than 624 square feet, the Commission wouldn't even be considering this matter. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola stated this was correct. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti asked if staff had an idea on what was an acceptable level when it comes to height differential. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola commented he couldn't say there was a strict line that was followed. He noted since he began with the City in 2018 there has not been a garage that has gotten this much attention. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti explained the proposed structure was on the opposite side of the house from the garage and was setback. She did not believe the 18 inches would be noticeable. She commented if the Commission believes the building was compatible, the Commission can move the item forward. However, if the Commission believes the structure was not compatible, the Commission can recommend denial with stated rationale. Commissioner Frischman stated she would have loved for this garage to come in at 624 square feet and for the Commission to not have to make a determination on this matter. However, because the garage came in larger than was required, her inclination was to deny the request. She did not want to infringe on the neighborhood and did not want to create an enforcement problem for the City. She indicated she would have liked for this garage to come in at 624 square feet. Chair Nichols-Matkaiti commented this was not the option before the Commission for consideration. Commissioner Enanaa stated the code requires the garage to be matching or compatible and noted the proposed garage does not match. Commissioner Allen asked if staff had a map showing the location of the proposed garage. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola reviewed an aerial of the property and noted the location of the proposed garage. He reported all setback requirements were being met. The Commission reviewed the eight criteria that had to be considered with special use permits. Commissioner Enanaa asked if the application was aware of the 11 conditions being recommended by staff. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola reported staff made the applicant aware of the 11 conditions. Commissioner Frischman questioned if the request could be denied based on criteria 7. Assistant Director of Community Assets and Development Gozola stated this was not typically a trigger for denial, but rather could be grounds for requiring additional screening of the structure. 4