My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2022.01.11 CC Packet
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2022
>
2022.01.11 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2023 11:20:50 AM
Creation date
12/12/2022 10:04:12 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />provided further details on the proposed ARPA spending plan and requested comments or questions from the <br />Council. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Axberg asked if there was an advantage to spending the ARPA dollars sooner rather than <br />later. Massopust explained there was not an urgency to spend the dollars but noted the dollars do have to be <br />allocated by the end of 2024 and spent by the end of 2026. <br /> <br />Councilmember Allen requested further information regarding the price of the drone. Paetznick noted the <br />original estimates were $30,000, but after looking into costs further, it was estimated the drone would cost <br />$50,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle asked if the proposed funding for front line workers would be a one time payment. <br />Massopust reported this was the case, noting staff was proposing a one time payment to these workers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dunsworth questioned how staff would decide what the City would spend the ARPA dollars <br />on first. Foschi noted the City would receive the second half of the ARPA funds one year after the first <br />payment was made. She commented further on the timing on when the funds would be received and discussed <br />how the City could plan for the expending these funds. <br /> <br />Councilmember Axberg reported she was hesitant to add a new position through these funds because it would <br />be tied to a future levy increase or future trade offs. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas commented the Assistant City Manager position was previously within the budget, <br />but in 2020 this position was dropped. She explained to add this position back in, this would require Council <br />approval. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas questioned how the levy would be impacted by using ARPA funds on the Parks <br />Comprehensive Plan. Davitt reported if the internal loan were used the repayment of the loan would have <br />added another $85,600 to the levy. She indicated using ARPA would eliminate this loan repayment amount <br />and was deemed a useable expense. <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle believed the Council needed to have more conversations regarding the Assistant City <br />Manager position. In addition, he supported more of the ARPA funding being infused into equity initiatives. <br />He did not believe the $45,000 was enough. He suggested the City consider creating a position that focuses on <br />housing giving the growing needs surrounding affordable housing. <br /> <br />Councilmember Allen stated generally he supported the one-time expenses as proposed by staff. He <br />commented he did not know what the future would hold or where the virus would go. He suggested the City <br />wait on expending ARPA funds for the Parks Comprehensive Plan. He discussed how the City Council had <br />worked to try and right size staffing and agreed the Assistant City Manager position should be discussed <br />further. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas asked how staff was proposing to spend ARPA dollars on equity initiatives. Suggs <br />stated this would be discussed by the Equity Commission and Equity Team. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas noted the Council had set aside $10,000 for translation services in 2022. Massopust <br />reported this was the case. <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle supported Councilmember Allen’s comment that the ARPA dollars should not be <br />used for parks because there were dollars already identified for these projects. He suggested other items be
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.