Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle explained he supported the proposed three year contract. He believed CPY provided <br />effective and much needed services to New Brighton, especially during the pandemic. He also supported CPY <br />finding more sustainable funding opportunities for their organization. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dunsworth stated New Brighton was the only City that contributes to CPY at this point. She <br />indicated no other cities or school districts were contributing. She commented she was not opposed to the City <br />contributing, but questioned why New Brighton was when no other cities were. She reco gnized the services <br />CPY was providing predominantly to New Brighton residents, but feared CPY was relying on New Brighton <br />too heavily. She stated generally, she had a problem with the City contributing to one non-profit in the <br />community, while not contributing to others who were also making meaningful contributions to New Brighton <br />residents. She supported the City exploring this more wholistically. She indicated she could support the three <br />year contract with a step down plan. She wanted to see the Council discussing a step-down approach with <br />CPY because New Brighton could not be a funding source in perpetuity, or that other cities should be <br />contributing equally. <br /> <br />Councilmember Allen commented the cities that could contribute to CPY based on benefitting communities <br />were New Brighton and Mounds View. He stated he understood CPY has approached Mounds View and the <br />school district to request funding. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas reported there was Council consensus to support a three year contract with CPY, <br />however there was not clarity on the amount and if it should step down or continue on with what was planned. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dunsworth supported the Council moving forward with $77,500 for 2022 and then stepping <br />this down to $67,500 for 2023 and 2024. She indicated this would assist CPY at the higher amount for one <br />more year given the pandemic but would then bring the contract back to the original number. <br /> <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas stated she supported this recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle explained he supported this recommendation as well. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dunsworth reported the Council had direct conversations with CPY and indicated the City <br />was very clear that they needed to stabilize their finances in order to allow the City to step back their funding. <br />She indicated the City offered CPY a cash injection due to the pandemic but this was not meant to continue <br />indefinitely. <br /> <br />Councilmember Abdulle stated his only concern was how much hurt a $10,000 loss would cause CPY in 2023 <br />and 2024. <br /> <br />Councilmember Allen commented he supported the $77,500 for three years, but he understood this was not <br />where the Council was the last time this was discussed. He reported the $20,000 loss over two years would be <br />substantial but letting CPY know up front would allow them to plan accordingly and he believed CPY would <br />remain afloat. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dunsworth discussed how CPY made good use of their PPP or CARES funding. She hoped <br />that this funding would allow this organization to pivot in a way that would offset any future reductions the <br />City would make to their funding. Massopust reported the City of New Brighton gave CPY $10,000 in CARES <br />funding in 2020. <br /> <br />