Laserfiche WebLink
February 22, 2022 Page 4 of 6 <br />City was looking to work with minority vendors or contractors. He appreciated the fact that the City was <br />doing all it could to make this project all inclusive and that historically excluded communities can benefit <br />from this project. <br />Councilmember Allen stated the Council would need to continue to hold conversations on how to partner <br />with local BIPOC vendors in the community. He indicated it would also benefit the Council to better <br />understand who would be working on this project, the actual make up of the employees to ensure more folks <br />are represented and benefitting from the work being done. He suggested the Council also further discuss the <br />prevailing wage that would be paid by contractors. <br />City Manager Massopust thanked the Council for their valuable feedback. <br />Parks and Recreation Director Fink discussed the benefit of having Krause-Anderson work <br />with Gordian on these projects, because they would be auditing the project. <br />Chris Ahrens, Gordian, introduced himself to the Council and noted another benefit of using <br />this process would be the reduction in change orders. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Abdulle, seconded by Councilmember Allen to Authorize the Director <br />of Parks and Recreation to issue a letter of intent to work with Krause-Anderson (KA) <br />for construction services utilizing the Sourcewell contract. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was taken. <br /> <br />4 Ayes, 0 Nays-Motion Carried <br /> <br />2. Consider a Resolution Supporting Housing and Local Decision-Making Authority. <br /> <br />City Manager Massopust stated it is no secret that housing industry groups and City officials don’t <br />always see eye to eye when it comes to the on-going housing crunch throughout the state. <br />Housing industry groups tend to attack city land use tools such as Zoning and Planned Unit <br />Developments (PUDs) as key road blocks to increasing the affordable housing stock. Cities <br />generally counter with data showing that labor costs, land costs, and material costs are the <br />main drivers of the market failures we see today. While reasonable people can disagree within <br />this debate and may support some provisions of proposed legislation, it is unquestionable that <br />some bills currently up for debate would make land use decisions on behalf of this Council <br />rather than allowing you to make your own decisions based on what’s best for New Brighton. <br />One bill in particular would—state wide—mandate that duplexes become permitted uses in all <br />areas zoned for single-family residential areas and within any new residential subdivision. The <br />same bill would also prohibit Council from conditioning approval of a building permit, <br />subdivision development, or PUD on the basis of the materials proposed to be used, building <br />design, amenities, or other aesthetics considerations not specifically required by the State <br />Building Code. Put another way with an example, under this legislation, Council could not <br />have conditioned approval of the US Bank redevelopment on use of specific materials and <br />amenities that made that building what it will be. In response to this brewing debate at the <br />Capital, the League of Minnesota Cities is suggesting that all member Cities wishing to support <br />both housing and local decision making approve a resolution to that effect. He reported staff <br />has prepared a resolution following the template provided by the League, and it is now before <br />the Council for consideration. <br />Councilmember Allen stated this was something he could support. He explained there were many laws with <br />potential State restrictions and he fully supported the Council adopting this Resolution. He supported New <br />Brighton having more accountability locally and did not recommend one size fits all regulations being <br />approved by the State. <br />Mayor Niedfeldt-Thomas explained she also supported this Resolution being approved. She did not want to <br />see proposed State regulations restricting the City’s growth opportunities. She believed the City needed to be <br />able to maintain the decisions that were right for the community. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />2. Consider a Resolution <br />Supporting Housing and <br />Local Decision-Making <br />Authority. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />