Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br /> <br />respect to Tax Increment Financing District No. 15, and is <br />also a housing district, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, <br />Section 469.174, Subdivision 11, because a portion of the <br />rental units of the project proposed for said District will, <br />pursuant to a certain Contract for Private Development, dated <br />as of January l4, 1988, by and between the City and Golden <br />Pond, a Minnesota limited partnership, be reserved for persons <br />of low and moderate income due to the infusion into the <br />overall project of certain Community Development Block Grant <br />funds and due to the fact that the developer will be financing <br />the project pursuant to the issuance of tax exempt multifamily <br />revenue bonds for a "qualified residential rental project" <br />within the meaning of Section l42(d) (1) (B) of the Internal <br />Revenue Code of 1986. In addition, the Council further finds <br />that said District qualifies as a redevelopment district, as <br />defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivision <br />10(a) (2) due to the fact that 70% of the parcels in said <br />District are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or <br />other improvements and 20% of the .buildings are structurally <br />substandard and an additional 30% of the buildings are found <br />to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to <br />remove such existing conditions as inadequate street layout, <br />incompatible uses or land use relationships, overcrowding of <br />buildings on the land, and obsolete buildings not suitable for <br />improvement or conversion. <br /> <br />2.02. The Council hereby finds that Tax Increment <br />Financing District No. 15 is a redevelopment district, as <br />defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subdivisions <br />10(a) (1) and 10(a) (2), respectively, because (I) 70% of the <br />parcels in said District are occupied by buildings, streets, <br />utilities, or other improvements and more than 50% of the <br />buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally <br />substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or <br />clearance and (2) 70% of the parcels in said District are <br />occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, or other <br />improvements and 20% of the buildings are structurally <br />substandard and an additional 30% of the buildings are found <br />to require substantial renovation or clearance in order to <br />remove such existing conditions as incompatible uses or land <br />use relationships and obsolete buildings not suitable for <br />improvement or conversion. <br /> <br />2.03. The Council further finds that the proposed <br />development would not occur solely through private investment <br />within the reasonably foreseeable future and, therefore, the <br />use of tax increment financing is deemed necessary; that the <br />Plans conform to the general plan for the development or <br />