Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />January 28, 1997 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Williams questioned what the next steps should be. Kolberg said the issue should be <br />forwarded to corporate management to determine its priority. The railroad wishes to <br />resolve the issue, but cannot spend $250,000 at this time. Williams does not expect the <br />railroad to provide funding immediately, but the City is anxious to reach an agreement. <br />Williams does not want this inconvenience to continue for 20 years. <br /> <br />Benke feels the best strategy is to communicate to railroad management that it is in their <br />best interest as well as the publics that the investment is made sooner rather than later. <br /> <br />City Attorney Charlie LeFevere said there is no reason to feel the railroad would not <br />cooperate, however, the City does have some leverage in continuing to issue tags. The <br />City could go before the Legislature and request authority to reduce blockage violation <br />time to five minutes. <br /> <br />Benke prefers that police resources are used to address crime and community issues <br />rather than sitting at a railroad crossing with a stopwatch. He favors communications <br />between railroad management and the City to develop short term options, however, <br />police monitoring and enforcement should continue. The turnaround site is identified in <br />the Hwy 8 Corridor Study, and resolving train delays would provide assurance to <br />prospective businesses that access to their business will not be impacted. The City <br />appreciates the railroad's willingness to find a way to resolve this issue. <br /> <br />Richard Loshirer, 4th Ave. NW, lives three blocks from the crossing, and on many <br />occasions the dishes in his house shake. The City needs to address this issue before the <br />Rottlund townhome development suffers. He supports the Council's action. <br /> <br />City Planner Erny Mattila presented an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to increase <br />the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) for service structures in R-l districts from 30 % to 35 % . <br />The City of Minneapolis Water Reservoir project was approved with a FAR of 33% <br />conditional on a PAR amendment to the zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission <br />held a public hearing and recommended approval of the amendment. <br /> <br />The intent of the 30% FAR is to ensure that a typical single family residential lot not be <br />so over occupied by the dwelling that there is not longer ample yard area. Conversely, <br />public service structures do not generate significant activity and their sole function is to <br />serve a public need. Similarly, industrial districts have a FAR of 40% because industrial <br />buildings and uses do not typically need large yards. The amendment would best be <br />achieved by adding language to Section 4-030(b) of the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> <br />Motion by Samuelson, seconded by Larson, to WAIVE THE READING, GIVE A <br />FIRST AND SECOND READING, ORDER THE PUBLICATION, AND <br />APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AMENDMENT SECTION 4-030(B), BY ADDING <br />THE LANGUAGE: "FLOOR AREA RATIOS OF UP TO 35% FOR SERVICE <br />STRUCTURE MAYBE AUTHORIZED BY A SPECIAL USE PERMIT." <br /> <br />4 Ayes -1 Nayes (Gunderman), Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Fulton presented the City's participation in financing, construction, and operation of a 4- <br />sheet ice facility at the National Sports Center. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Railroad Crossing <br />Issues <br />Report 97-019 <br /> <br />FAR Amendment <br />Report 97-020 <br />Ordinance 625 <br /> <br />Agreement for 4-Sheet <br />Ice Facility <br />Report 97-021 <br />