Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />July 23, 1996 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Ron DeCoux, 1124 Robin and Clinch-on-Products (COC), said COC has purchased the <br />Basic Industries building at 1275 Old Hwy 8, and plan to subdivide the lot, build a new <br />facility, and sell/rent the existing building. This moratorium hits COC very hard <br />because of their interest to move by Spring 1997. COC opposes the moratorium, and <br />requests a minor subdivision and exclusion from the moratorium. Benke said a minor <br />subdivision must go before the Planning Commission. Mattila said they need a site plan <br />to determine if the site is adequate for a 30,000 sq. ft. building. Benke said that <br />excluding a property from the moratorium is difficult, but deferring the second reading <br />allows for review. <br /> <br />Jake Cadwallader plans to acquire three residential parcels on Old Hwy 8 and retain <br />residential usage, but is concern of the moratorium. Benke speculates this area may be <br />left residential, and suggested the second reading be held in August and requested staff <br />follow-up with prospective applicants. Larson feels more applicants may surface after <br />hearing of the moratorium. Fulton said the City-owned driving range should be added to <br />the moratorium, but questioned if it impacts the temporary soccer field. Benke said the <br />soccer field is a temporary, interim use and should be noted as that in the moratorium. <br /> <br />Motion by Larson, seconded by Samuelson, to WAIVE THE FIRST READING TO <br />ADOPT THE ORDINANCE PLACING A MORATORIUM ON DEVELOPMENT <br />AND REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ON CERTAIN PROPERTIES WITHIN <br />THE HWY 8 CORRIDOR; DIRECT STAFF TO FOLLOW-UP ON QUESTIONS <br />RAISED BY PROSPECTIVE APPLICANTS; AND ADVISE COUNCIL OF ANY <br />MODIFICATIONS WHICH WILL BE NEEDED FOR THE SECOND READING. <br /> <br />3 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Mattila presented the Adult Use Ordinance. The ordinance would regulate adult use <br />operations and restrict their location to a portion of industrial areas representing 5 % of <br />City land area. The City cannot prohibit adult uses, however, it can regulate operation <br />and location providing such uses have access to public streets and utilities, and the areas <br />designated represent at least 5 % of the City's land area. <br /> <br />LeFevere said it may seem the City is authorizing adult uses not currently allowed. <br />However, because of the First Amendment these uses cannot be prohibited outright but <br />can be regulated for police power, zoning, property values, and increased crime. The <br />intent is to regulate these uses so it minimizes impact on residential and commercial <br />areas. Samuelson asked the reason for the 5 % land area. LeFevere said this is the <br />minimum amount allowed by law. Benke added that the ordinance needs to be very <br />specific in order to be enforceable. Larson asked if Section 14-415 (f) (2), License <br />Requirement could include reference to delinquent child support payments. LeFevere <br />does not feel the City could tied these payments into the application process. <br /> <br />Motion by Samuelson, seconded by Larson, to WAIVE THE FIRST AND SECOND <br />READING, ORDER THE PUBLICATION, AND ADOPT THE ORDINANCE <br />RELATING TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH, SAFETY, MORALS, AND GENERAL <br />WELFARE: PUBLIC HEALTH: AMENDING NEW BRIGHTON CITY CODE <br />BY AMENDING SECTION 15-218; ADDING A NEW ARTICLE XIV; AND <br />AMENDING APPENDIX A, SECTIONS 6-030, 6-130, AND 6-230. <br /> <br />3 Ayes - 0 Nayes, Motion Carried. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Moratorium on Old <br />Hwy8 <br />Report 96-162 <br />Ordinance 623 <br /> <br />Adult Use Ordinance <br />Report 96-163 <br />Ordinance 622 <br />