Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 7, 1994 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />Council Business. continued <br /> <br />Civil Engineer, Brian Olson. said an analysis was performed on a Windsor Green <br />townhome valued at $100,000. If the utility fund were adopted, a townhome unit <br />would be charged $7.19 annually as opposed to $15.49 annually through property <br />taxes. The Windsor Green Complex resides on 33.5 acres and has 236 units. <br /> <br />Following the last meeting, Fulton spoke with Mr. Carlson, a Windsor Green <br />resident, regarding the analysis. When incorporating the income tax deductibility of <br />property tax costs at a 30% income tax bracket; a Windsor Green owner would be <br />eligible for an income tax deduction of $4.65 which results in a real cost of $10.84. <br />In comparison, the annual utility fund cost for a Windsor Green unit would be <br />$7.19; and would actually provide a $3.65 advantage over the property tax <br />approach. <br /> <br />Benke confirmed that lower valued residential properties would pay a small amount <br />more with the utility fund method. It appears the breakeven point would be for <br />properties valued at $87,000 or higher which would see a reduction when the utility <br />method is used. Residential lots are classified on a per lot basis, and townhome <br />complexes are classified on a per acre cost. <br /> <br />Harold Kurtz. 1465--17th Ave. and Mounds View School Board Chair, noted the <br />many cooperative ventures between the School District and the City; and the City is <br />allowed to use District facilities free of charge. The proposal would charge the <br />District about $3,500 annually. The Board understands the need for increased City <br />revenue, but feels it should not be accomplished by shifting costs from one public <br />body to another. <br /> <br />Staff found that several cities residing within the District currently charge <br />stormwater utility fees to the District. Benke said the proposal reflects the need to <br />provide equity among City taxpayers, and the fee would directly assess those <br />creating the costs. Benke acknowledged the joint ventures with the District; but the <br />District is now being charged for water and sewer usage. Olson confirmed that <br />Mounds View, Arden Hills, and Shoreview, which all reside within the District, <br />currently charge the District a stormwater fee. Gunderman noted that five of the <br />seven cities residing within the District currently charge this fee. Gunderman asked <br />how the Board intends to revisit this issue. Kurtz said the Board may review the <br />costs associated with providing the use of their facilities. <br /> <br />On behalf of the Windsor Green Association, David Evans of 150 Windsor Ct., <br />requests the City ensure that the Windsor Green Ponds qualify for a credit upon <br />adoption of the utility plan. Evans feels it is unfair that lesser valued homes would <br />be charged a larger fee than higher valued homes. <br /> <br />Adelle Floren, 211 Windsor Ct., requests staff work with Windsor Green to ensure <br />the ponding credit. Fulton does not see a problem with the request. <br /> <br />Fulton said the philosophy is to resolve inequitableness of the current system and <br />apply cost impacts to land classifications producing a greater amount of runoff. <br />Evans questioned the analysis used to determine residential fees. Fulton said staff <br />researched three differently sized residential lots to compute a determination of <br />runoff. Benke acknowledged that neither sy~tem is perfect, but the City will attempt <br />to pursue cost impacts which are proportionate to contributing land classifications. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Stormwater Utility <br />Plan <br />Report 94-263 <br />