Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />July 13, 1993 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />Council Business, continued <br /> <br />Pat Crisha, 286 Windsor, thanked Council for allowing residents to give <br />input. She noted a study which found that road design dictates speed <br />levels, and feels the roadway needs minor corrections and rejects the use of <br />public funds. The ISTEA Internodal Surfact Transportation Efficiency Act of <br />1991 purpose is to develop a national interconnected transportation system <br />which is economically efficient, environmentally sound, provides the <br />foundation for the Nation to compete in a global economy to move people <br />in an energy efficient manner. Any reconstruction should be for the safety <br />of residents, quality of life, environment, and future orientation for <br />alternative methods of transportation. To focus on a wider, faster Silver <br />Lake Road is not in the best interest of the health of the community. <br /> <br />Wayne Carlson, 197 Windsor, noted the many different speed levels <br />throughout the City, and found that Silver Lake Road is the only residential <br />street which has a speed level over 35 mph. He is concerned of possible <br />assessments to the Windsor Green Association. <br /> <br />Proper noted that several years ago, a minimal assessment was charged to <br />residents along Silver Lake Road between 7th St. and 1-694 when that <br />portion was upgraded. Because most of the reconstruction costs will come <br />from Federal, MSA and County funds, staff proposes a minimal residential <br />assessment for the costs remainder. Additional research will be made <br />regarding the funding for unwarranted signals, and landscape costs would <br />be eligible for State and Federal funding. <br /> <br />Rebelein asked how this proposal fairs under the ISTEA Legislation. Benke <br />said the rules and regulations for that Legislation are still under <br />development. Rebelein feels the City should take a look at how City <br />actions would affect this law. Benke said the landscaping enhancements <br />would reflect issues included in the Legislation. <br /> <br />Dave Phillips, 2369 Sioux, asked if his lot would be assessed. Proper <br />verified that Phillips' property would not be assessed. Phillips questioned <br />the plan to install a retaining wall on the portion of his lot which backs up <br />to Silver Lake Road. He is concerned that the project is rushing along, and <br />there is a lack of sensitivity to the residents between 3rd and 5th St. He <br />feels the real problem between 3rd and 5th St. is not the dip, but the hill <br />south of 3rd St. It is not solely a speed limit issue, but a design problem. <br /> <br />Benke noted that the initial design calculations based on a 40 mph speed <br />would have required a grade elevation change of 4 ft. at the bottom of the <br />crest. Council requested a recalculation to reflect a 35 mph speed, this <br />recalculation then changed the elevation to 3 1/2 ft. <br /> <br />Mr. Phillips feels that if the hills are lowered, the sag would not need to be <br />raised. He does not recall previous discussions regarding a 3 1/2 ft. <br />elevation change. He asked the City to take control and design the road to <br />limit the grade elevation to 1 ft. <br /> <br />A resident asked if three Councilmembers is enough to make a decision. <br />Benke noted that the quorum is adequate for a decision to be made. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Silver Lake Road <br />Reconstruction <br />Project <br />Report 93-198 <br />