|
<br />Page 4 - August 22, 2006 New Brighton Council Minutes
<br />
<br />Director of Corrununity Development, Grant Femelius explained the amendments
<br />.dress a number of issues and presented a brief su.mrnaJy,
<br />
<br />Council Member Doffmg requested an explanation of "Foregoing their rights for
<br />development,"
<br />Mr. Femelius stated that Sherman Associates has the rights to develop an Office
<br />Project on the former Keys Restaurant site, That right nms through December 31,
<br />2006, Part of the amended agreement states that the developer has agreed to give
<br />up those development rights, that means that once this amendment is executed
<br />the City has the right to market that site to other developers,
<br />
<br />Motion by Council Member Bauman, seconded by Council Member....IJ()ffrn'a~to
<br />approve the resolution authorizing the execution and delivery ()f th~First'.,
<br />Amendment to Amended and Restated Contracts for PrivateR:~development be~~~p
<br />the City and each of the Rottlund Company, Inc. and Sherll1a~Associates, Inc. ... ...
<br />
<br />5 Ayes ~ 0 Nays, Motion Carried
<br />
<br />;:::::::::;:::;\::(',:,'>;. >::.., .: :::::::<::::,::,:::">::;://::
<br />3. Consideration of Proposal to pemolish Stru6~~~t.715 Old
<br />Highway 8 NW and 389 Old Higtl}'Yay 8 NW, Repgl-tNo. 06-193.
<br />
<br />,"'"'''''' ,..,
<br />,.., """;.::"::':""",,,,,,,,,, ,', ,':.,,;"\
<br />
<br />.sistant Director o~ Corrununity De~eIOPITl~~6~ffiJ::l~}{ exp~edtl1at. 4
<br />proposals were receiVed; the lowest bid was fr()'~::g.Rogerp<;~J:lConsttilction of
<br />Blaine. .. .
<br />
<br />Counru Meml= Doffing#~~~'~lana~~~~:'~ of
<br />
<br />Hany's bar. ...../..,u/,.i;;.,::
<br />Mr. Black explained ~~iffi. a prior p~,that location,~y have been considered for
<br />redevelopment. In late 2q~>.the 9~e~ofI-I12U'I',y'~baT'ilpproached the City, for the
<br />~e of his proES~.;..<!he CftY-/.~~Wsed the pro~~Jor approximately $140,000
<br />ill March 2003,/,.,.....<..,.....//.,...... .."/".."...."',......
<br />councilM~~~i56ff'rriiiqlJestion~'\lIleather there was a plan for the property.
<br />MaY9?pn explained~~:~t thetifue.,council decided it was a fair purchase
<br />price~:~~g it was anin.y~~tmen1:tohave control of the property.
<br />Mayor ~!"'l suggested a wot'ij::session at a later date to review the Old Highway 8
<br />conidor prn.qfr9m that time.i.i;
<br />Council Mem~l:"Qoffing ques~9ijed how Hany's Bar fit into a plan in the south
<br />end of town.<ii;:i..i
<br />Mr. Femelius expliruJ.~itl1~~'Was an Old Highway 8 study done in both in 1986
<br />and again in 1997, offepfuiill provide the council with that material.
<br />Council Member Bauman questioned the Comprehensive plan from 1997, Mr.
<br />Black explained there was no link between the comprehensive plan and the
<br />~hase of Hany's bar.
<br />WIs. Troha explained that there are two separate plans, a comprehensive plan and
<br />an Old Highway 8 conidor plan.
<br />
<br />Motion by Council Member Hoffman, seconded by Council Member Burg to award
<br />the demolition contract for 715 and 389 Old Highway 8 NW to Roger Peterson
<br />
<br />3. Consideration of Proposal
<br />to Demolish Structures at
<br />715 Old Highway 8 NW and
<br />389 Old Highway 8 NW.
<br />Report No. 06-193.
<br />
|