My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1991-11-26 (2)
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Minutes - City Council
>
Minutes 1991
>
1991-11-26 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2005 4:10:44 PM
Creation date
8/9/2005 3:01:30 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />f: <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />NEW BRIGHTON'S SUCCESS SYMBOLS <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />Nationally Accredited Police Department (First in Minnesota) <br />A ward Winning Parks <br />Tree City U.S.A. <br />National Certificate for Annual Financial Report <br />Excellent Bond Rating (A-I) <br />Minnesota "Star" City <br />Long Range Plan for the maintenance, reconstruction and financing of the City's streets, <br />utilities, parks and city facilities. <br />Low water rates and clean drinking water <br />Very low number of fulltime employees per capita <br />Wel1~trained and equipped all volunteer fire department <br />A community spirit of volunteerism on boards, commissions and in community organizations <br /> <br />* <br />* <br />* <br /> <br />* <br />* <br />* <br />* <br /> <br />TAXES AND SPENDING - THE NEW BRIGHTON STORY <br /> <br />According to the Minnesota Department of Revenue, New Brighton's tax rate for the city share of property <br />taxes is the second lowest in the metro area for the 31 cities with over 20,000 in population! <br /> <br />Looked at in a different way, if we use the City share of the property tax rate only, the City's share in <br />~columbia Heights in 1991 was 45% higher than New Brighton, St. Anthony's was 60% higher, etc. (see <br />.... Tables 1 & 2) <br /> <br />ax rates, of course are not the only measure of the efficient use of tax dollars. Cities with a high <br />property valuestax base are able to spend more and still keep a low tax~. Another measure of financial <br />success, then, is to look at City spending on a per capita basis. <br /> <br />Again, New Brighton is among the best. <br /> <br />According to statistics recently published by the Minnesota Taxpayers Association, of the 31 cities in the <br />State of Minnesota with populations between 20,000 and 50,000 <br /> <br />The average per capita spending in 1989 was $342.80 <br /> <br />New Brighton's per capita spending was $283.36 <br /> <br />Only four cities had a lower per capita spending than New Brighton <br /> <br />Why then, are taxes on a home in New Brighton higher than one in Fridley when the City share of the <br />taxes in Fridley are 21 % higher than in New Brighton? <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />* <br /> <br />One major reason is that the county share of property taxes in Ramsey county is 28.8% higher than in <br />Anoka County (see Table 3). Thus, reports in the newspapers which show high taxes for Ramsey County <br />suburban communities fail to mention that the Cities in Ramsey County generally have the lowest per capita <br />~... spending among all cities, but when the city rates are added to the rates charged by the schools and the <br />lIounty, taxpayers in Ramsey County start to show a higher tax burden. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.