Laserfiche WebLink
<br />.- <br /> <br />November 20, 1991 <br /> <br />City of New Brighton <br />Finance Director <br />803 5th Ave NW <br />New Brighton, MN 55112 <br /> <br /> <br />"- <br /> <br />Patricia Pryor Lipinski <br />Daniel M. Lipinski <br />803 12th Avenue NW <br />New Brighton, MN USA 55112~2666 <br /> <br />This letter is in response to the NOTICE OF PROPOSED PROPERTY TAX FOR 1992 that we have <br />recently received regarding our property in the City of New Brighton (FINN 29-30-23-21-0038-3). <br /> <br />We believe that the PROPOSED 1992 PROPERTY TAX CHANGE for our property of +6.7% is out-of- <br />line. How does it figure? <br /> <br />There have been no property or dwelling changes made since 1983 when the house was built, so it does not <br />seem to be related to an improvement made to the property. Inflation, and land prices have not been +6.7% <br />for 1991, so how can the tax value increase at that rate? <br /> <br />,~-. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I have been employed as a Federal employee since March of 1987. My salary increases (after a decrease of <br />16% going from 1986 to 1987 due to a "reduction-in-forces" at my former employer) have been 3% in <br />1987, 2% in 1988, 4.1 % in 1989, 3.6% in 1990, and 4.1 % in 1991 as prescribed by federal law (and limited <br />in any case to the rate of inflation - .5%1) do not seem to add up to the same as the following property tax <br />increases during those same 5 years. During this same period of time the tax increases on the New Brighton <br />property have been +14.67% in 1987, 0.4% in 1988, +10.42% in 1989, +6.38% in 1990, +8.82 in 1991 - <br />and now a proposed +6.7% for 1992! Tell me how this can bel Explain it to me in words of one syllable if <br />you can so I can better understand how these things are calculated I <br /> <br />Add to the above supporting information regarding salary increases vs the tax increases is the fact that we as <br />the owners do not make use of the SCHOOL DISTRICf since we do not have any children, and probably <br />require fewer TOWNSHIP and COUNTY services than most residents. Therefore, any proposed tax <br />increases also ought to be applied on the basis of applicability of services received for the payment of the <br />taxes. <br /> <br />We would like this letter to be noted in any meetings held to discuss the proposed property taxes for 1992. <br /> <br />Thank you, <br /> <br />:;2- " <br />/- ",-j) ,," " <br />(' 'O-,_1.~~ ~_ :~j, ~r-L"'-'~-K'~ <br /> <br />B&N~ 1Y\. ~ <br /> <br />Patricia P. Lipinski <br />Daniel M. Lipinski <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />;~-. <br />