My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CCP 09-26-2006
NewBrighton
>
Council
>
Packets
>
2006
>
CCP 09-26-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2006 12:45:43 PM
Creation date
9/22/2006 3:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />Delaune inquired if there were any thoughts about tying elements from south of the I -694 bridge, <br />such as the monuments, into this area. Horn replied that some elements will be pulled in. <br />Delaune indicated that he is concerned that the design is isolated, and not connected to the <br />community. He is also worried that it will take twenty years to rebuild the bridge and thinks that <br />it would help the community to understand the project better if there is a master plan showing the <br />northern and southern portions of Old Highway 8 and how the bridge may look when it is <br />replaced, so residents will know what the full plan will be. Wyffels replied that the bridge will <br />probably not take twenty years to replace, but may take ten to twelve years until I-694 is <br />upgraded. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Harreld inquired about the potential to put in a separate pedestrian bridge. Horn replied that <br />would be a possibility, although it would be expensive to build a separate bridge. Harreld noted <br />that several other communities in the area have pedestrian bridges. Horn added that there is <br />federal funding available; however it is a very competitive process. Wyffels noted that the City <br />had looked into retrofitting the bridge, however MnDOT stated that the whole bridge will be <br />demolished when 1-694 is redone. The City had also looked into replacing the bridge; however <br />MnDOT could not give a definite date on when the City could expect repayment. Kaufhold <br />asked if a pedestrian walk could be added to the existing bridge. Horn replied that securing the <br />bridge would be just as expensive as putting in a new one. Harmon suggested that in the balance <br />between the cost and the users, pedestrians may come up short. Delaune suggested that bridge <br />issue won't go away. <br /> <br />Sculthorp inquired how this road design will fit in with the rest of the streets in the City. Larson <br />replied that the street will look very similar to Silver Lake Road. Horn stated that because the <br />road has turn lanes, it will need to maintain the proposed median and the median could be <br />painted or landscaped. Flahave inquired if the redesign will continue up to Highway 96. <br />Wyffels replied that it does not go up that far. Black added that the area being redeveloped will <br />be largely residential with denser development, and the road should function for that type of <br />development. However, north of this development is the park and an industrial area and the road <br />does not need to look or function the same way here. He added that there is an agreement with <br />the developers for the City to improve the road. Fernelius stated that there is nothing preventing <br />the City on creating a design to improve the road up to Highway 96; however he does not want <br />to lead anyone to believe that area will be redone, because the City has no plans to redo the road <br />past the Long Lake Park entrance. <br /> <br />Harmon asked how the bike lane would be included in the development if not on Old Highway 8. <br />Wyffels stated that the trails throughout the development will be eight to nine feet wide and will <br />accommodate pedestrians and bikers. Fernelius added that there will be access to the <br />development under the freeway. Wyffels stated that there are numerous ways to get to the <br />development, though some of them may not be ideal. <br /> <br />Motion by Stang, seconded by Flahave, to recommend Option 2, no bike lanes, <br />. for the Old Hwy 8 reconstruction. All approved. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.