Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />"', ','i <br /> <br />.... N~:t ~ppriJved <br />'--""v' .",. ",-,. .". <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION PROCEEDINGS <br />CITY OF NEW BRIGHTON <br /> <br />Regular Meeting - September 19, 2006 at 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Present: Commissioners Larry Baker, Bruce Howard, Karen Mann, Jim O'Brien, <br />Norm Schiferl, and Paul Zisla. <br /> <br />Absent: Tom O'Keefe and Commissioner Sharon Doffing. <br /> <br />Also Present: Grant Fernelius, Community Development Director. <br /> <br />Agenda Review: Agenda approved. <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes: The August 15, 2006 was approved. <br /> <br />Council Action: No Council report given. <br /> <br />Announcements: Fernelius reported that Janice Gundlach, City Planner, had her baby <br />and he will be covering her duties while she is on maternity leave. <br /> <br />Public Hearings: NC06-01 Type 4 Non-Conforming Use Permit for allowing <br />construction of additions to the home where the front yard setback is 29' where 30' <br />is required. <br /> <br />The subject site has a single-family home that encroaches into the front yard setback and <br />a shed that encroaches into the side yard setback; the owner wishes to construct an <br />addition to the house and garage. The proposed addition does not encroach into any <br />required setback and the applicant has stated that they "'fill move the shed to meet setback <br />requirements, thus reducing the number of non-conformities on the site. Staff believes <br />issuance of a Type-4 Non-Conforming Use Permit is appropriate under these <br />circumstances. It appears the addition will enhance the home and will not have a <br />detrimental appearance upon adjacent properties or the neighborhood in general. <br /> <br />Baker inquired if the house was built with a variance or if the twenty-nine foot setback <br />was an error during construction. Fernelius replied that it appears it was a construction <br />error, but staff was unable to confirm this theory. Eleanor Carlson, homeowner, stated <br />that the addition is for family members that are moving in. She added that the shed will <br />be demolished. Schiferl asked if Carlson knew why the house was constructed one foot <br />over the setback. Carlson stated that she purchased the house after it was constructed and <br />does not know why the house is over the setback. <br /> <br />Motion by Baker, Second by Schiferl to CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br /> <br />6 Ayes, 0 Nays, MOTION CARRIED. <br /> <br />.. '>:~;': ,c.. <br /> <br />Page 1 of7 <br /> <br />,H;'i j:: ,c. ~,<, \ 'I . CiT1> <br /> <br />'<'111':(:': <br /> <br />.Ii .'~ j <br /> <br /><: I <br />