My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LP-014
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Site Plan File - Approved PLZ 01900
>
LP-001-100
>
LP-014
>
LP-014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2008 10:13:13 AM
Creation date
10/31/2006 1:29:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
House File
PIN Number
323023240010
Address
300 9TH AVE SW
House Number
0300
Street
9TH
Street Type
AVE
Direction
SW
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,.... . <br /> <br />October 9, 1975 <br /> <br />TO: Thomas F. Lewcock, City Manager <br /> <br />---'$ <br />FROM: Barry P. Johnson, Building & Planning Coordinator <br /> <br />RE: Trend Enterprises <br /> <br />.,' <br /> <br />Trend Enterprises is making two requests of the City Council. <br />These requests are not directly linked, however, both matters would <br />have to be set~led in order for Trend Enterprises to be able to occupy <br />its new facility. <br /> <br />The first request is for modification of the landscape and plot <br />plan in two regards. First, the applicant would like to alter many <br />of the variety of plantings that were shown on the original landscape <br />plan. Secondly, the applicant wishes to reduce the amount of paved <br />and curbed area that was shown on the original plan. <br /> <br />The changes in the landscaping plan do not, in my judgment, <br />affect the over-all quality of the plan except to increase that quality <br />and in no way violates any of the requirements of the Zoning Code. <br />The reason for the revision to the landscape plan is, as I understand <br />it, because the pressure of time when the first application made required <br />that the architect draw up the landscape plan on his own. Subsequently, <br />the owners of the company in viewing the plan after it had been <br />approved, decided that it did not satisfy their own individual tastes. <br />In addition, the drainage swale between their buildings was originally <br />ind~ated to be sodded. The heavy rains this year have shown that a <br />considerable erosion problem is likely to result if this swale is <br />sodded and in consultation with the landscape architect, they are <br />proposing to plant the ditch with polygonum, a hardy ground cover <br />which should more adequately resist the potential erosion in the swale. <br /> <br />The parking area, as stated, is also proposed to be reduced. The <br />original site plan showed a parking area sufficiently large to accommo- <br />date the parking needs of the development including the proposed two <br />future stages. Because of cost considerations and the lack of <br />necessity at this time, the applicant would like to reduce the area <br />to that which would be sufficient for the building being constructed <br />at this time. This certainly would comply with Code requirements. <br />In addition, the extent of concrete curbing around the parking lots is <br />proposed to be reduced. At the time the original building permit was <br />approved, concrete curbing was required around all parking and maneuvering <br />areas. The requirement has since been modified to require concrete <br />curbing around parking and maneuvering areas only in yards abutting <br />streets for industrial developments. Areas in which curbing has been <br />deleted are in the rear yard of the development. One of the reasons <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.