My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LP-022
NewBrighton
>
Commissions
>
Commissions-OLD
>
PLANNING
>
Planning
>
Site Plan File - Approved PLZ 01900
>
LP-001-100
>
LP-022
>
LP-022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/25/2008 9:52:22 AM
Creation date
11/1/2006 2:51:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
House File
PIN Number
333023220072
Address
85 2ND AVE SE
House Number
0085
Street
2ND
Street Type
AVE
Direction
SE
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council Consiceration <br />Building Permit <br />July 8, 1975 <br /> <br />Request: Council authorization of building permit for expansion <br />to existing industrial building <br /> <br />Applicant: Ideal Grain and Seed Cleaner Company <br /> <br />Location: 85 2nd Ave. BE <br /> <br />Size of Expansion: 64' x 76': 18 feet high <br /> <br />Exterior Treatment: stucco on front face: painted concrete block <br />on other sides <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />The plan provide0 by the applicant is complete. The <br />landscaping is well chosen ano located and will preserve <br />existing plantings on the site and supplement them with <br />additional plantings. There is one slight error in the land- <br />scaping schedule. The height of the Crimson King Maple <br />should be approximately doubled for the container size that is <br />shown. <br /> <br />We would also suggest that since the alley which is shown <br />on the plan was vacated a number of years ago that the parking <br />and maneuvering areas that are proposed to be curbed have their <br />curbs joined in this area. <br /> <br />Lastly, we note to the Council that this plan shows three <br />driveways. This requires special Council permission according <br />to Section 12-060 (c) where there are to be more than two drive- <br />ways. On a frontage of this size on a nead end street as this <br />is, we see no problem with having the three driveways. The <br />applicant has noted that at a future date when there is a second <br />expansion of the building, there would be only two driveways <br />and one would be removed. <br /> <br />Planninq Commission Reccrr~endation- June 17. 1975: <br /> <br />Motion by Parham, seconded by Partyka, to recommend <br />approval of LP-22 on the condition that curbing around parking <br />and driveway areas on the side and rear yard be joined if the <br />alley in that area is vacated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.