Laserfiche WebLink
<br />------.- ,~_.._---_._~_.~----~----_._------------_._........_-~----._-_._-_.-.-._..-_._-_.__.~------_.__. <br /> <br />'" <br /> <br />LP-49 <br /> <br />" <br />-/..- <br /> <br />,..,.. <br /> <br />3. Parking requirements for restaurants are calculated on <br />the basis of one space for eve~y two seats. <br /> <br />4. The indicated capacity for the proposed restaurant is 150 <br />seats requiring 75 parking spaces. 85 spaces are shown <br />on the site plan. <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Access to the property <br />of adjacent 'property. <br />approval. <br /> <br />wquld be via two driveway easements <br />Such access is subject to council <br /> <br />Discussion: <br /> <br />As noted, the proposed use is for a Godfather's pizza Restaurant. <br />The restaurant would service both "sit down" ana "take-out" <br />customers. Overall, the s it~ l.ayout appears to be adE:qua te with <br />sufficisnt room for ingress, egress and internal circulation. <br /> <br />The compatibility of this p:Loposed use tvith the adjacent <br />apartments is of pr ime impo:t:tati..::e. 'l'he comprehens ive Plan <br />eypresses the des ire tha i.: any :..~()r:lmel:C ia 1 use be well buffered <br />from the apartments. The Zo:-dp:J Cede requires th;;}t ;::1 15 foot <br />huffer strip be provided along th~ northern portion of the <br />restaurant property, and that that screening either in the form <br />of an evergreen hedge or fence c€ provided. The landscape plan <br />indicates thel5- '::oot st:r i9 ':JO\lld 0<:' 9rovided and tha l the <br />screenir.g would be a staqgereo, c1ouble-rO\'l of 5 - 6 f("lot planted <br />blue and g:::-0en spruce t~'2es. OGIO conL;er~ is that the intitial <br />screening effect may be insufficient. A suggestion pe:rnap? <br />is tha t a 3 - 4 foot berm b'2 pruv ided in the buffer zone <br />with the i~dicated spruc~ t~s~s planted on top of the berm. As <br />the p.::'0peJ.::t.y o....-'uer of th.:: 3~bje~t 1.::,<,:,,;,'c21 is 'the sar.\~ [or thl=' <br />apartments, it: milY be pOGS ibl~ to "epill overll t~le berm some.l7hat <br />onto the apartment property. If such an agreement could be <br />mad(;;, '.'e m1.sht: Ci) so Sug-:;2St. i:.1<1';':;' sp:>..lce trees 2.1so be provided <br />on the ap~rtment property on the north side of the 3hared <br />apart~ent driveway. At present, th~ northeast cnrner of <br />the propos2o parking lot is e::.~Of:;.;;:j to the apart"'1enocs. <br /> <br />\~ <br /> <br />Access to the pa:!::'cel may als0 b2 q'J8stioned. Acces!" on :::he south <br />is via a permanent roadway easement attached to the property. <br />'PM!; YJ.e~ lcl be () ohal. ~a eL! L:rartCC to !.lie propo-r~ This "10U 10 be <br />a shared entrance with the existing office building along <br />County Road D. Access on the north woul~ be via the southern <br />apartment driveway on Old Highway 8. The restaurant would certainly <br />